We performed a comparison between Amazon EKS and Komodor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."What I found most valuable in Amazon EKS is its maturity as a cloud computing technology."
"The most valuable features of Amazon EKS are its auto scaling ability and the ability for service discovery."
"Provides high performance and easy manageability."
"The solution has very good basic features."
"Overall Amazon EKS is a good solution in the industry. The solution can support multi tendencies, and network isolations are the key factors."
"The solution is easy to use."
"It's a faster solution to adopt on native applications."
"Amazon EKS can be used to implement and create clusters."
"The more time we use Komodor the more we save. Currently, we have seen around a ten percent return on investment."
"Komodor's multi-cluster centralized event timeline is the most valuable feature."
"The service overview is definitely the most valuable feature. With it, I can see all the services and see if they're healthy or not without having to go specifically into each workflow individually. It has been immensely helpful for us whenever we've had network issues or other such issues. We've been able to use Komodor and see at a glance where there might be potential issues."
"The event timeline has been super helpful, enabling us to overlay node events in the same timeline as deployment events... That helps an engineer very quickly troubleshoot without having to do too much digging."
"The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly check what's happening or what has happened."
"I believe the initial setup could be a better experience and faster customer support."
"I'm having difficulty getting my AWS clusters to communicate with my local machine."
"They should enhance the Jira integration."
"The tool's setup is complex."
"Amazon EKS should improve its integration."
"I am not impressed with the tool's Amazon console. It also needs to add security features."
"The overall stability of the product should be improved to prevent any loss of data."
"Amazon EKS provides very minimum information during the upgrade of the node group."
"I would like to see improvements in how the product is installed. We've already communicated these things directly to Komodor. One feature we would like to see is for Komodor to be highly available on the clusters. Currently, it's only able to run in one instance within the cluster."
"Komodor's visibility could be improved."
"One thing we don't have visibility into, which I would love to have, is metrics, such as user logins and usage. It's really hard to know what people are doing when I don't have any metrics on that directly."
"I like the alerts that Komodor provides, but I think the alert interface could be improved."
"I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development."
Amazon EKS is ranked 2nd in Container Management with 39 reviews while Komodor is ranked 12th in Container Management with 5 reviews. Amazon EKS is rated 8.6, while Komodor is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Amazon EKS writes "Supports multiple tools and has a straightforward setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Komodor writes "Provides extensive visibility into our nodes and has been incredibly useful in freeing up our DevOps staff for other projects". Amazon EKS is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes and Rancher Labs, whereas Komodor is most compared with Portainer and Rancher Labs. See our Amazon EKS vs. Komodor report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.