We performed a comparison between Apiiro and SonarQube based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly."
"The workflow automation is likely the best aspect of the solution."
"This solution has the capability to analyze source code in almost all the languages in the market."
"The most valuable feature is the security hotspot feature that identifies where your code is prone to have security issues."
"The software quality gate streamlines the product's quality."
"It is working fine. It provides a good value for money."
"It assists during the development with SonarLint and helps the developer to change his approach or rather improve his coding pattern or style. That's one advantage I've seen. Another advantage is that we can customize the rules."
"It provides you with many features, as it does with the premium model, but there are still extra features that can be purchased if needed."
"Issue Explanations: Documentation with detailed samples. Helps in growing technical knowledge and re-writing logic to conforming solutions."
"We consider it a handy tool that helps to resolve our issues immediately."
"I would like support for our self-hosted Git server, other than GitHub, just regular Git."
"User management is a little bit clunky."
"It would be better if SonarQube provided a good UI for external configuration."
"The reporting can be improved."
"After scanning our code and generating a report, it would be helpful if SonarQube could also generate a solution to fix vulnerabilities in the report."
"Currently requires multiple tools, lacking one overall tool."
"The software testing tool capability could improve. It does not always integrate well. You have to use a specific plugin and the plugin does not always go in Apple's applications."
"A little bit more emphasis on security and a bit more security scanning features would be nice."
"There are times that we have the database crash. However, this might be an issue with how we have configured it and not a software issue. Apart from this, I do not see any issues with the solution."
"In terms of what can be improved, the areas that need more attention in the solution are its architecture and development."
Apiiro is ranked 21st in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) with 2 reviews while SonarQube is ranked 1st in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) with 110 reviews. Apiiro is rated 8.6, while SonarQube is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Apiiro writes "A great secrets detection feature, good visibility, and integrates well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonarQube writes "Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages". Apiiro is most compared with Snyk, Ox Security, Cycode, Semgrep Supply Chain and Checkmarx One, whereas SonarQube is most compared with Checkmarx One, SonarCloud, Coverity, Veracode and Snyk. See our Apiiro vs. SonarQube report.
See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.