We performed a comparison between AppDynamics and Coralogix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Once you get past installation, AppDynamics is highly stable and we get good results."
"It gives me the ability to trace logs between transactions, for example, a DB transaction or JVM transaction from one hub to the other. I can easily find out where the problem is or where the bottleneck of the issues lies."
"That visual representation’s been really good, also the overhead that AppDynamics creates is quite small. We've tried Dynatrace in the past. Some of the applications didn't work as well with Dynatrace."
"It has improved our organization with its ability to catch issues quickly and fix them."
"The SAP monitoring element is very helpful."
"The AppDyniamics technical support is good. We haven't had any problems with them. They answer very quickly."
"The most valuable feature of AppDynamics is its ability to track the transactions between different applications."
"We're a large organization, so we appreciate AppDynamics' wide coverage. It may not work in all areas, but it has broad coverage. We can use the same dataset for different use case aspects. That is the beauty of AppDynamics. You can coordinate APM, EUM, and infrastructure through one dataset."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The integration ability of AppDynamics with other performance testing tools is an area with shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The overall performance of this solution could be improved. The hot-hot infrastructure features could also be improved."
"This solution is expensive."
"It needs strengthening in the database tiers."
"The GUI can be overwhelming at first to a novice Dev or Ops support person, and the possible root causes of an issue do not bubble up to the first screen you see."
"The infrastructure is not as good as other solutions."
"The documentation and training material have room for improvement."
"The agent deployment could be simplified by, for example, adding a GUI."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
AppDynamics is ranked 5th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 155 reviews while Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews. AppDynamics is rated 8.2, while Coralogix is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AppDynamics writes "Very good real-time monitoring capabilities, deep problem diagnosis, and transaction mapping". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". AppDynamics is most compared with Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and New Relic, whereas Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Sentry, New Relic and MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager. See our AppDynamics vs. Coralogix report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.