We performed a comparison between ArcSight Logger and Wazuh based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It provides in-depth information on business activities once we log into the system."
"The most valuable feature is the level of detail that you can see about certain events, even when they do not come up in the console."
"The ESM use cases are the most valuable. It enables us to use the big data collection inside our company. We are able to create use cases for whatever it suits and I find that the most interesting part of any SIEM solution."
"We check a lot of logs in ArcSight Logger because we're running a massive database platform."
"It's an efficient solution."
"It's a brilliant log collection tool, and it can handle hundreds of thousands of servers in a single shot to ingest the data."
"We haven't had any crashes or bugs. It is stable."
"Our return on investment for implementing ArcSight Logger over the past 12 months has been positive."
"Some of the strengths of Wazuh that stand out for us include its scalability when deployed on Azure, its open-source nature, which allows for customization based on our needs, and its compatibility with various security solutions like threat intelligence platforms."
"I find the PCI DSS feature the most valuable, along with the feature that monitors the compliance of Windows and the CIS benchmarks on other devices like Unix or Linux systems."
"We use it to find any aberration in our endpoint devices. For example, if someone installs a game on their company laptop, Wazuh will detect it and inform us of the unauthorized software or unintended use of the devices provided by the company."
"Wazuh automatically scans the host for CIS benchmarks for the latest updates and vulnerabilities and gives a host score. It provides a percentage of perceived risk due to of non patches or any missing patches on that work."
"The deployment is easy and they provide very good documentation."
"Wazuh's best features are syscheck, its ability to immediately resolve vulnerabilities, and that it's open source."
"The main thing I like about it is that it has an EDR."
"Wazuh is free and easy to use. It is also adjustable, and we can use it on the cloud and on-premises."
"The console in older versions is not user-friendly."
"The product's connectors should work better and the user manuals need an update."
"You have limited reporting capabilities and I wouldn't choose ArcSight Logger for this purpose."
"I think the ArcSight team should try to simplify legacy products for the customers, because that product is not easy to use or to work with. It needs more more competency or appeal to use. We hope Micro Focus is trying to resolve this."
"The solution must provide readymade connectors for different applications."
"It is really difficult to work in ArcSight Logger, as it is very slow."
"We have had problems with archiving."
"The solution should make it possible to integrate network analysis features."
"A more structured approach, perhaps with modular UI components, to facilitate easier integration and navigation within the Wazuh platform for custom integrations would be beneficial."
"The support team could be more responsive and provide quicker replies during our working hours in Indonesia, which would be a significant improvement."
"It would be better if they had a vulnerability assessment plug-in like the one AlienVault has. In the next release, I would like to have an app with an alerting mechanism."
"One area where Wazuh could use some improvement is in its reporting mechanism, especially for high-level management like CSOs and CEOs."
"Scalability is a challenge because it is distributed architecture and it uses Elastic DB. Their Elastic DB doesn't allow open source waste application."
"Since it's an open-source tool, scalability is the main issue."
"I think that the next release should be more suitable for large enterprises, because currently they are not because large companies do not rely on open source solutions."
"The implementation is very complex."
ArcSight Logger is ranked 28th in Log Management with 31 reviews while Wazuh is ranked 2nd in Log Management with 38 reviews. ArcSight Logger is rated 7.8, while Wazuh is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of ArcSight Logger writes "A scalable and stable solution that enables users to see all the event logs in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wazuh writes "It integrates seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services". ArcSight Logger is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security, LogRhythm SIEM and syslog-ng, whereas Wazuh is most compared with Elastic Security, Security Onion, AlienVault OSSIM, Splunk Enterprise Security and Graylog. See our ArcSight Logger vs. Wazuh report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
