We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and OpenText ProVision based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Object oriented modeling allows us to trace what's going on with the specified object."
"It has the ability to scale up, as well as integrate with other systems within the organization to get real-time information from dashboards and reports."
"Objects can be reused across different BPMNs and processes, so we can design new processes quicker and easier."
"The BPMN notation and the share flow through users. It is nice to see all flows in a common, shared space for all the stakeholders to view the same thing and the same language."
"The ability to sort via multiple criteria to identify the relationships you need for a specific object."
"ARIS Reporting – Helps download valuable content from the tool in multiple formats."
"The solution's basic features are easy to use, overall designed well, and it has good process mining analysis."
"It helps to maintain a single source of truth regarding the processes followed within an organization."
"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."
"All the features come as part of a standard license."
"The stability of the product is very good."
"Its governance tool and integration with ESB and execution engine can be improved. Their partner support can also be improved."
"Needs flexibility in automation of the modeling processes and real-time analysis of data, not just a static view."
"Simulation is one area that is a bit complex."
"I could use more icons and other graphical elements."
"I believe the solutions BPM tools are not very good and need improvements."
"Create simple data uploader."
"The interface is a little archaic."
"I had a hard time with ARIS's access and licensing policy. It requires you to pay for each step you want to take forward with the solution."
"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."
"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."
"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."
ARIS BPA is ranked 6th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 64 reviews while OpenText ProVision is ranked 35th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while OpenText ProVision is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText ProVision writes "Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Camunda, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Bizagi, whereas OpenText ProVision is most compared with Visio, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and SAP Signavio Process Manager. See our ARIS BPA vs. OpenText ProVision report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
