We performed a comparison between Arista Campus LAN Switches and Cisco FabricPath based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two LAN Switching solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The feature sets are pretty cool. They've got almost everything that the competition offers."
"The CloudVision Portal allows us to centrally manage all of our Arista products."
"QoS is the most valuable feature because our clients work with VOIP and Critical applications."
"FabricPath's best features are routing, OSPS, ethernet, and performance."
"The technical support we get from Cisco is excellent. It's the best in the industry. We're more than satisfied with the level of service they provide."
"It's very stable."
"Cisco is the market leader in this space and it is a product that I recommend."
"The tool makes it easy to manage multi-layer networking and increases network efficiency. I haven't faced any challenges in integrating it into our existing infrastructure."
"The setup is straightforward."
"As I mentioned earlier, the durability, flexibility, and security of Cisco devices are notable. Particularly with switches, the capability to implement multiple VLANs and easily aggregate the network has been advantageous. The ability to have different VLANs and aggregate the network without complications is a key feature of Cisco FabricPath."
"Additional bandwidth is available when needed."
"I would like to see a version available with eight or sixteen ports."
"It would be ideal if the solution was less expensive."
"One of the issues that we have been faced with here in Brazil is that we don't have any list times for delivery."
"Lacks sufficient integration with SIEM."
"Layer 3 does not have higher availability."
"The product lacks AI...The initial setup of Cisco FabricPath was a bit complex."
"The documents could improve for Cisco FabricPath. There are times when the relevant information is not present in the different sections of the documents, such as deployment. The documents should be more detailed and enhanced."
"I would like to see better interoperability with other IT solutions."
"The solution is complex to set up."
"Improvements could be made on specific technical issues such as implementation."
"In terms of the series, I find that the integration with other teleconferencing applications needs to be more seamless. I have suggested to Cisco that the endpoint device should allow joining calls from Microsoft Teams, Zoom, and other teleconferencing applications. Additionally, I appreciate the recent inclusion of breakout sessions in the Cisco Webex application, which enhances its relevance in the networking field."
Earn 20 points
Arista Campus LAN Switches is ranked 13th in LAN Switching while Cisco FabricPath is ranked 8th in LAN Switching with 22 reviews. Arista Campus LAN Switches is rated 8.8, while Cisco FabricPath is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Arista Campus LAN Switches writes "Stable, has a lot of uplink interfaces, and several can be centralized managed through a single portal". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco FabricPath writes "Makes multi-layer networking easy and increases network efficiency". Arista Campus LAN Switches is most compared with Cisco Catalyst Switches, whereas Cisco FabricPath is most compared with Juniper QFabric and Cisco Nexus. See our Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. Cisco FabricPath report.
See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.
We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.