Aruba Instant On Switches vs Cisco Catalyst Switches comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
HPE Aruba Networking Logo
2,698 views|1,438 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Cisco Logo
10,596 views|5,320 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aruba Instant On Switches and Cisco Catalyst Switches based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two LAN Switching solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Cisco Catalyst Switches Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is plug-and-play and auto-configured.""The dashboard for clients is very nice.""Its customer service is good.""The solution is suitable for small businesses and small offices.""It is a very stable solution.""The solution has a simple deployment and zero border.""Instant On Switches' best feature is the 1930, which is stackable.""The solution provides GUI control, making it particularly suitable for small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and small office/home office (SOHO) networks."

More Aruba Instant On Switches Pros →

"Their technical support is good, one of the best in the industry.""The Cisco software ties all the hardware together better than the competition.""The product’s scalability and performance are valuable.""It is easy to install.""Cisco provides very good support services.""I think it is a reliable and scalable solution.""Scalable, stable, and reliable product that's easy to install. Technical support is dependable and can be contacted in a variety of ways, e.g. through their ticketing system, hotline number, and community forum.""The solution is stable."

More Cisco Catalyst Switches Pros →

Cons
"We are interested in acquiring a firewall that provides a comprehensive solution. In other words, we're seeking a firewall that encompasses multiple aspects, such as exceptional switches and active phone functionalities.""It could have an MSP portal version.""The pricing is competitive but could be improved.""Tracking with instant switches needs improvement.""They could provide additional uplink ports, such as eight instead of four. It will be beneficial for our use case.""The support needs improvement.""In the next version, they should add a firewall from a single source.""The product's startup speed is very bad, as it is very slow."

More Aruba Instant On Switches Cons →

"With most of the Cisco devices and models, we faced a slight decrease in speed during the initial setup and while restarting the system""It is kind of expensive.""Dell switching is coming up with a solution where you can put your own OS inside their switching infra. That is where they are talking about open networking. We can show that our Cisco is also an open-source. We are open to different switching operating systems if the customer is willing to put it in. We can support multiple operating systems inside the switching infrastructure. It removes the hardware and software dependency on each other. That is where I think there can be room for improvement. Then we can talk about open networking and that is where Cisco can also come up with open networking access.""The delivery of the product lead time should be improved.""In terms of what could be improved, more integration is the main thing they should be focused on.""I would like for Cisco to come up with an affordable dynamic VLAN solution.""Reporting could be improved as well as integration possibilities with other platforms.""In terms of performance, Juniper switches have a more user-friendly interface and more features than Cisco switches."

More Cisco Catalyst Switches Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is competitive, and there are no supplementary fees."
  • "The license for Instant On Switches is free."
  • "I give the price seven out of ten."
  • "It is an expensive solution."
  • "We pay an annual licensing fee."
  • "The pricing is cheap."
  • "Aruba Instant On Switches is not expensive."
  • "Aruba Instant On Switches is cheaper than Cisco and expensive compared to some Chinese brand products."
  • More Aruba Instant On Switches Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "​The price should go down instead of up. ​"
  • "It has a very high cost, but understandably, due to its very good quality."
  • "Cisco's prices are not cheap, but the stability is worth it."
  • "Pricing could be better."
  • "If you consider Cisco's price with the Dell, you will definitely lose with Cisco. But Cisco has a major area of equipment in general. Cisco has routers, firewalls, NAC, certain video conferencing, Apple phones, and different security solutions. But Dell doesn't have such areas, Dell only has switching architecture."
  • "Generally, Cisco Catalyst would be relatively expensive compared to the competition, it would be on the expensive side."
  • "Pricing is an issue I have been facing, in comparison with HPE or Juniper. The Nexus series is out of the question right now. Scalability is more an issue on the pricing side and less on the technology side."
  • "Catalyst is very expensive."
  • More Cisco Catalyst Switches Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution has a simple deployment and zero border.
    Top Answer:The solution neither offers advanced features nor security. It could have an MSP portal version.
    Top Answer:Hello Mesfin It depends on the real scenario, the cisco 2960 is a very good device and they usually have routing functions but there are many different models within the same 2960 line, and on the… more »
    Top Answer:We are a vendor for the healthcare sector, especially hospitals, and normally, we use a full Cisco solution for stability, especially for the stability of the Access Points and the security of… more »
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing a ten out of ten, with ten being expensive.
    Ranking
    4th
    out of 16 in LAN Switching
    Views
    2,698
    Comparisons
    1,438
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    306
    Rating
    8.5
    1st
    out of 16 in LAN Switching
    Views
    10,596
    Comparisons
    5,320
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    473
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Aruba Instant On 1930 Switches
    Cisco Catalyst, Catalyst
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Aruba Instant On 1930 switches features advanced, smart-managed, fixed configuration Gigabit switches designed for small businesses that are easy-to-deploy and affordable. They’re made to handle today’s bandwidth-heavy applications like voice and video conferencing, enabling consistent connectivity to enhance performance. Using either the Instant On mobile app or the cloud-based web portal, you can quickly set up, monitor and manage the 1930 switch series from anywhere at any time. What’s more, up to 30 W PoE power delivery is available out-of-the-box for your class 4 PoE devices, like access points, surveillance cameras and VoIP phones, all easily managed from the same platform.

    Cisco Catalyst Switches are a reliable and scalable network switching and routing solution, focusing on VLANs and VLAN switching. They are used as access switches, distribution switches, and core switches in various environments, deployed on-premises, and used for long connections. The switches are easy to configure, install, and upgrade and offer good pricing. 

    The most valuable features include warranty and firmware support, stability, security, good performance, flexibility, etc. The Cisco Catalyst Switches have provided a stable solution for the organizations and are widely used, trusted, and well-known in the networking industry.

    Sample Customers
    KEMET, Vestavia Hills City Schools, Dropbox
    Afni, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Del Papa Distributing, Explorer Pipeline, Mindtree, Omaha World Herald, Radio 538, Sony Corporation, Telecom Italia, Telenor Arena
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company30%
    University20%
    Construction Company10%
    Outsourcing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Educational Organization9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Construction Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    University10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization53%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Government4%
    Manufacturing Company4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business55%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise18%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise41%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise58%
    Large Enterprise30%
    Buyer's Guide
    Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Cisco Catalyst Switches
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Cisco Catalyst Switches and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Aruba Instant On Switches is ranked 4th in LAN Switching with 21 reviews while Cisco Catalyst Switches is ranked 1st in LAN Switching with 171 reviews. Aruba Instant On Switches is rated 8.4, while Cisco Catalyst Switches is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aruba Instant On Switches writes "A very stable tool that needs to offer better startup speed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Catalyst Switches writes "Reliable and stable catalyst switch; can be easily installed". Aruba Instant On Switches is most compared with HPE ProCurve, NETGEAR Switches and Cisco Nexus, whereas Cisco Catalyst Switches is most compared with Arista Networks Platform, Dell PowerConnect Switches, Cisco Nexus, HPE ProCurve and NETGEAR Switches. See our Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Cisco Catalyst Switches report.

    See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.

    We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.