We performed a comparison between Aruba Networks Wireless WAN and Cambium Networks Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It integrates with the Aruba portfolio very easily, and it's a vendor-agnostic solution, and that's brilliant."
"Aruba Central seems to be a good way to go in cloud management. However, compared to Cisco Meraki, it's still very early days."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of setup and deployment."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"In the event of a controller appliance failure or downtime, the system seamlessly transitions control to any access point acting as a backup controller."
"Aruba makes use of "Direct Tunnel" as its best security feature."
"From the performance perspective, I'm happy with the solution. Also, from the technical side, it seems to be pretty good."
"Its most valuable feature is the ease of use."
"The solution's coverage range is good, it is easy to use, and deployment is very easy and user-friendly."
"It is a good product for cloud management."
"The initial setup of Cambium is straightforward."
"It's a good product and works well when there is a lot of interference."
"It excels in challenging environments and adverse weather conditions, maintaining high performance without any impact on the link quality."
"The pricing of the product is very, very reasonable."
"It is easy to deploy and has many specialists to help us handle complicated processes."
"The most valuable features of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN are cloud management and links."
"We do not have direct access to Aruba’s Mesh portal."
"From the commercial-side the pricing side is fine but in other aspects, it could be lowered."
"Device integration has room for improvement in Aruba Networks Wireless WAN."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The solution has bugs. It really has bugs, and you have to wait until it happens, then you realize it."
"The customization options could be improved."
"This solution needs different models that are more specialized for certain customers."
"The price for the license could be a bit improved since it is the only area with an issue."
"If they could move from the fixed wireless point to mobile, it will make a big change in the market. The cnPilot coverage should be covering big spaces. It should also have an external antenna, not a built-in antenna."
"There is room for improvement in the support."
"I think this product could be improved if It were SMS based. If I have a visitor in my office, I'd like to be able to send them the wireless password as a message via SMS, so I don't have to give it out."
"If someone wants to go to the location-based portal of the product, like the one available in Meraki, it would not be possible, and it is an area that needs improvement."
"If it's in a warehouse, it is very hard to deploy."
"The solution's price could be better."
"Pricing tends to be higher than its competitors."
"The installation is difficult."
More Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 5th in Wireless WAN with 47 reviews while Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 24 reviews. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.4, while Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN writes "It's reliable, cost-effective, and easy to troubleshoot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN writes "Provides point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connectivity and user-friendly solution". Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Fortinet FortiWLM and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, whereas Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Ruckus Wireless WAN and Cisco Wireless WAN. See our Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.