We performed a comparison between AWS CodePipeline and Harness based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation."In AWS, the Cloud DevOps is a managed service from CodeCommit and this has removed the need for a lot of manual steps."
"The most valuable feature of AWS CodePipeline is the flexibility of the configuration."
"It helps develop CI/CD implementations with centralized management of code building, deployment, and version control."
"AWS CodePipeline has valuable integration features."
"The tool's recent version helps us to run pipelines in parallel. The integration with other AWS services has greatly impacted our use of AWS CodePipeline. It made tasks such as integrating with Jira and provisioning instances much easier."
"The integrations are good."
"It's a perfect solution if you are just using AWS."
"AWS CodePipeline offers multiple integrations and it has its own set of features in the area of code scanning and dynamic code testing."
"It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."
"In the next release, I would like to see fewer timeout errors."
"If you're talking about multi-cloud, you can't use it."
"The migration process from one source code to another needs improvement."
"AWS CodePipeline doesn't offer much room for customization."
"The tool does not provide automated features for evidence collection."
"AWS CodePipeline functions well, but there's room for improvement in providing technical support to regular customers who haven't purchased developer support. I mean, having it available for everyone, even if it's not a 24-hour service. It would be more useful if specific support hours were available for assistance."
"The support team’s response time must be improved."
"If there are many dependancies involved in the setup, it may take a long time."
"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."
AWS CodePipeline is ranked 3rd in Build Automation with 13 reviews while Harness is ranked 8th in Build Automation with 1 review. AWS CodePipeline is rated 8.4, while Harness is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AWS CodePipeline writes "A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Harness writes "Provides a good graphical interface, but the initial setup process needs improvement ". AWS CodePipeline is most compared with GitLab, AWS CodeStar, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and TeamCity, whereas Harness is most compared with Tekton, Jenkins, Bamboo, GitHub Actions and Cloudability.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.