We performed a comparison between AWS CodePipeline and Tekton based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Build Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The integrations are good."
"AWS CodePipeline has valuable integration features."
"Code deployment is the best feature."
"The tool's recent version helps us to run pipelines in parallel. The integration with other AWS services has greatly impacted our use of AWS CodePipeline. It made tasks such as integrating with Jira and provisioning instances much easier."
"The integration with other applications is fabulous."
"AWS CodePipeline offers multiple integrations and it has its own set of features in the area of code scanning and dynamic code testing."
"I find performance to be the most valuable CodePipeline feature. It works perfectly and smoothly."
"In AWS, the Cloud DevOps is a managed service from CodeCommit and this has removed the need for a lot of manual steps."
"Tekton is an orchestrator. It provides seamless integration for our pipelines. It offers robust support for executing tasks within the pipeline, allowing us to set up and run pipelines quickly."
"Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively."
"Tekton is serverless and runs on OpenShift, and we leverage Tekton to take full advantage of the Kubernetes features such as running and scaling the solution in PaaS."
"AWS CodePipeline functions well, but there's room for improvement in providing technical support to regular customers who haven't purchased developer support. I mean, having it available for everyone, even if it's not a 24-hour service. It would be more useful if specific support hours were available for assistance."
"The solution could improve the documentation. Sometimes we have some issues with the documentation not updating after releasing .NET 6. We had some issues with building the code pipeline, and it was not updating the documentation. It's better to update the code documentation."
"The support team’s response time must be improved."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"If you're talking about multi-cloud, you can't use it."
"If there are many dependancies involved in the setup, it may take a long time."
"There could be a possibility of deploying tag-based conditions for different environments using the same code base."
"The tool does not provide automated features for evidence collection."
"It tends to occupy a significant amount of disk space on the node, which could potentially pose challenges."
"There might be occasional issues with storage or cluster-level logging, which can affect production."
"Configuring Tekton requires a deep understanding of Kubernetes, which can be difficult for developers."
AWS CodePipeline is ranked 3rd in Build Automation with 13 reviews while Tekton is ranked 4th in Build Automation with 4 reviews. AWS CodePipeline is rated 8.4, while Tekton is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AWS CodePipeline writes "A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tekton writes "A pipeline tool to create CI integrations for applications with ease of use". AWS CodePipeline is most compared with GitLab, AWS CodeStar, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and Bamboo, whereas Tekton is most compared with GitLab, GitHub Actions, Travis CI, Harness and Concourse for VMware Tanzu. See our AWS CodePipeline vs. Tekton report.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.