We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and Wallarm NG WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."AWS WAF is very easy to use and configure on AWS."
"We can host any DB or application on the solution."
"The access instruction feature is the most valuable. This is what we use the most."
"The stability of AWS WAF is valuable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability to integrate central sets. It protects from intrusion attacks such as scripting and SQL injections."
"The ease of deployment of the product is valuable to me."
"Rule groups are valuable."
"The security firewall plus the features that protect against database injections or scripting,"
"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."
"The price could be improved."
"I believe there is a need to move towards real-time analysis with the help of AI and intelligent systems in the future. This would reduce the reliance on manual work and enhance the functionality of detection protection. By incorporating AI-driven data analysis and data science techniques, we can improve the solution's user-friendliness, security compatibility, and accuracy."
"We must monitor and clean up the WAF manually."
"We have issues with reporting, troubleshooting, and analytics. AWS WAF needs to bring costs down."
"The solution could improve by having better rules, they are very basic at the moment. There are more attacks coming and we have to use third-party solutions, such as FIA. The features are not sufficient to prevent all the attacks, such as DDoS. Overall the solution should be more secure."
"The user experience, the interface, is lacking. Sometimes it's hard to find certain areas that it has alerted on."
"We haven't faced any problems with the solution."
"When users choose the free service, there isn't great support available to them."
"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."
Earn 20 points
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while Wallarm NG WAF is ranked 33rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF). AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while Wallarm NG WAF is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wallarm NG WAF writes "Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas Wallarm NG WAF is most compared with Salt Security, Noname Security, F5 Advanced WAF, Cloudflare and 42Crunch API Security Platform.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.