Azure Search vs Elastic Search comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
1,865 views|1,586 comparisons
62% willing to recommend
Elastic Logo
3,475 views|1,221 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Search and Elastic Search based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Search as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Search vs. Elastic Search Report (Updated: May 2024).
787,033 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Creates indexers to get data from different data sources.""Because all communication is done via the REST API, data is retrieved quickly in JSON format to reduce overhead and latency.​""Azure Search is well-documented, making it easy to understand and implement.""The product is extremely configurable, allowing you to customize the search experience to suit your needs.""The product is pretty resilient.""The solution's initial setup is straightforward.""The customer engagement was good.""It provides good access capabilities to various platforms."

More Azure Search Pros →

"The solution is stable and reliable.""It helps us to analyse the logs based on the location, user, and other log parameters.""Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time analytics with Elastic benefits us due to the huge traffic volume in our organization, which reaches up to 60,000 requests per second. With logs of approximately 25 GB per day, manually analyzing traffic behavior, payloads, headers, user agents, and other details is impractical.""I like how it allows us to connect to Kafka and get this data in a document format very easily. Elasticsearch is very fast when you do text-based searches of documents. That area is very good, and the search is very good.""The solution is valuable for log analytics.""The initial installation and setup were straightforward.""The initial setup is very easy for small environments.""X-Pack provides good features, like authorization and alerts."

More Elastic Search Pros →

Cons
"It would be good if the site found a better way to filter things based on subscription.""For SDKs, Azure Search currently offers solutions for .NET and Python. Additional platforms would be welcomed, especially native iOS and Android solutions for mobile development.""For availability, expanding its use to all Azure datacenters would be helpful in increasing awareness and usage of the product.​""They should add an API for third-party vendors, like a security operating center or reporting system, that would be a big improvement.""The initial setup is not as easy as it should be.""The pricing is room for improvement.""The solution's stability could be better.""The after-hour services are slow."

More Azure Search Cons →

"Something that could be improved is better integrations with Cortex and QRadar, for example.""I would rate the stability a seven out of ten. We faced a few issues.""I don't see improvements at the moment. The current setup is working well for me, and I'm satisfied with it. Integrating with different platforms is also fine, and I'm not recommending any changes or enhancements right now.""It should be easier to use. It has been getting better because many functions are pre-defined, but it still needs improvement.""The solution has quite a steep learning curve. The usability and general user-friendliness could be improved. However, that is kind of typical with products that have a lot of flexibility, or a lot of capabilities. Sometimes having more choices makes things more complex. It makes it difficult to configure it, though. It's kind of a bitter pill that you have to swallow in the beginning and you really have to get through it.""They could improve some of the platform's infrastructure management capabilities.""Elastic Search could benefit from a more user-friendly onboarding process for beginners.""We'd like more user-friendly integrations."

More Elastic Search Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "​When telling people about the product, I always encourage them to set up a new service using the free pricing tier. This allows them to learn about the product and its capabilities in a risk-free environment. Depending on their needs, the free tier may be suitable for their projects, however enterprise applications will most likely required a higher, paid tier."
  • "For the actual costs, I encourage users to view the pricing page on the Azure site for details.​"
  • "I think the solution's pricing is ok compared to other cloud devices."
  • "I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, where one is the low price, and ten is the high price."
  • "The solution is affordable."
  • "The cost is comparable."
  • More Azure Search Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "ELK has been considered as an alternative to Splunk to reduce licensing costs."
  • "An X-Pack license is more affordable than Splunk."
  • "​The pricing and license model are clear: node-based model."
  • "This is a free, open source software (FOSS) tool, which means no cost on the front-end. There are no free lunches in this world though. Technical skill to implement and support are costly on the back-end with ELK, whether you train/hire internally or go for premium services from Elastic."
  • "We are using the free version and intend to upgrade."
  • "It can be expensive."
  • "This product is open-source and can be used free of charge."
  • "We are using the open-sourced version."
  • More Elastic Search Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Search as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    787,033 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The after-hour services are slow. It could be better.
    Top Answer:We use the solution to link the Active Directory account to Office 365.
    Top Answer:Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time… more »
    Top Answer:I don't see improvements at the moment. The current setup is working well for me, and I'm satisfied with it. Integrating with different platforms is also fine, and I'm not recommending any changes or… more »
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 14 in Search as a Service
    Views
    1,865
    Comparisons
    1,586
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    395
    Rating
    6.8
    1st
    out of 14 in Search as a Service
    Views
    3,475
    Comparisons
    1,221
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    507
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Amazon Kendra logo
    Compared 65% of the time.
    Amazon Athena logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Algolia logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Solr logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Faiss logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Milvus logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Pinecone logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Amazon Kendra logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Qdrant logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Elastic Enterprise Search, Swiftype, Elastic Cloud
    Learn More
    Overview
    Azure Search is a search-as-a-service cloud solution that gives developers APIs and tools for adding a rich search experience over your data in web, mobile, and enterprise applications. Functionality is exposed through a simple REST API or .NET SDK that masks the inherent complexity of search technology. In addition to APIs, the Azure portal provides administration and prototyping support. Infrastructure and availability are managed by Microsoft.

    Elasticsearch is a prominent open-source search and analytics engine known for its scalability, reliability, and straightforward management. It's a favored choice among enterprises for real-time data search, analysis, and visualization. Open-source Elasticsearch is free, offering a comprehensive feature set and scalability. It allows full control over deployments but requires managing and maintaining the infrastructure. On the other hand, Elastic Cloud provides a managed service with features like automated provisioning, high availability, security, and global reach.

    Elasticsearch excels in handling time-sensitive data and complex search requirements across large datasets. Its scalability allows it to handle growing data volumes efficiently, maintaining high performance and fast response times. Integrated with Kibana, Elasticsearch enables powerful data visualization, providing real-time insights crucial for data-driven decision-making.

    Elastic Cloud reduces operational overhead and improves scalability and performance, though it comes with associated costs. It is available on your preferred cloud provider — AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. Customers who want to manage the software themselves, whether on public, private, or hybrid cloud, can download the Elastic Stack.

    At its core, Elasticsearch is renowned for its full-text search capabilities, capable of performing complex queries and supporting features like fuzzy matching and auto-complete.

    Peer reviews from various professionals highlight its strengths and weaknesses. Pros include its detection and correlation features, flexibility, cloud-readiness, extensibility, and efficient search capabilities. However, users have noted challenges like steep learning curves, data analysis limitations, and integration complexities. The platform is generally viewed as stable and scalable, with varying degrees of satisfaction regarding its usability and feature set.

    In summary, Elasticsearch stands out for its high-speed search, scalability, and versatile analytics, making it a go-to solution for organizations managing large datasets. Its adaptability to different enterprise needs, robust community support, and continuous development keep it at the forefront of enterprise search and analytics solutions. However, potential users should be aware of its learning curve and the need for skilled personnel for optimization.

    Sample Customers
    XOMNI, Real Madrid C.F., Weichert Realtors, JLL, NAV CANADA, Medihoo, autoTrader Corporation, Gjirafa
    T-Mobile, Adobe, Booking.com, BMW, Telegraph Media Group, Cisco, Karbon, Deezer, NORBr, Labelbox, Fingerprint, Relativity, NHS Hospital, Met Office, Proximus, Go1, Mentat, Bluestone Analytics, Humanz, Hutch, Auchan, Sitecore, Linklaters, Socren, Infotrack, Pfizer, Engadget, Airbus, Grab, Vimeo, Ticketmaster, Asana, Twilio, Blizzard, Comcast, RWE and many others.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise66%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Azure Search vs. Elastic Search
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Search vs. Elastic Search and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    787,033 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Search is ranked 6th in Search as a Service with 8 reviews while Elastic Search is ranked 1st in Search as a Service with 59 reviews. Azure Search is rated 7.4, while Elastic Search is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Azure Search writes "Good performance for standard faceted search and full-text search". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Elastic Search writes "Played a crucial role in enhancing our cybersecurity efforts ". Azure Search is most compared with Amazon Kendra, Amazon Athena, Amazon AWS CloudSearch, Algolia and Solr, whereas Elastic Search is most compared with Faiss, Milvus, Pinecone, Amazon Kendra and Qdrant. See our Azure Search vs. Elastic Search report.

    See our list of best Search as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Search as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.