We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security and Juniper vSRX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtualization Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We find the protection the solution provides valuable."
"It is very easy to configure and deploy."
"Security for malware and threats is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is the IDS."
"The features I found most valuable in Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security include anti-malware, spyware detection, firewall, network detection, and user behavior analytics. The solution also gives you a heads-up about operating system misconfiguration."
"The solution is very scalable."
"The product offers an opportunity to monitor the things happening in our network. It also has a comprehensive dashboard."
"Virus scan and the ability to remotely install are valuable features. Being able to manage everything in one place and set different policies and rules for different computer types are very useful features. It also has ransomware protection. It is very simple to use, and it is very effective."
"The hardware is stable."
"The technical support has been good."
"We like the solution’s protocol and its dashboard system."
"The features we found most valuable are using the IDS and IPS during protection. The application filtering feature is great."
"There are a few valuable features that offer very good quality on the solution. Especially NetScreen. We used to use NetScreen for the the product line. It was a very mature solution, very robust, easy to configure, easy to manage, etc. It made it easy to do everything."
"One of Juniper vSRX's most valuable features is its integration with safety applications. It keeps the software secure from developers without relying on third-party solutions."
"It is deployed on the customer site, and we manage the firewalls on this side."
"The dashboard, customization, API, and pricing are good."
"The solution's stability could be better."
"I like the Application Control feature, but it's a bit tricky. Managing it can be a bit cumbersome sometimes."
"Machines with low memory and CPU may experience slow performance."
"The firewall capabilities could benefit from an upgrade since it lacks a high level of granularity and control."
"There is room for improvement in CPU utilization."
"The connection with the controller needs improvement. Some connections are currently unstable."
"They've got all this training that's available, but it involves stuff that doesn't really encompass the solution as a whole."
"The dashboard can be improved."
"I would like to see an activity sensor for malicious content or sensor for viruses and malware."
"The biggest downside of Juniper vSRX is its pricing, which may be too high for smaller organizations. While it's a decent solution, the cost may limit its accessibility to smaller customers."
"Juniper vSRX is expensive."
"The security feature must be improved."
"Fortinet is more user friendly than Juniper. In terms of remote access, I actually prefer using Fortinet. It's much easier to configure."
"We worked with Cisco's support and Juniper's support and there are some differences, to be honest, Cisco is more available and is more competent at addressing our cases."
"The user interface could always be better. They could make it simpler and more intuitive."
"We experienced some technical issues during implementation"
More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is ranked 4th in Virtualization Security with 23 reviews while Juniper vSRX is ranked 3rd in Virtualization Security with 33 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is rated 8.2, while Juniper vSRX is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security writes "Gives a good snapshot of what's going on". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper vSRX writes "Fast with good usability and fairly scalable". Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is most compared with HP Wolf Security, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, Seqrite Endpoint Security, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, whereas Juniper vSRX is most compared with Juniper SRX Series Firewall, Azure Firewall, Meraki MX, Cisco Secure Firewall and OPNsense. See our Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Juniper vSRX report.
See our list of best Virtualization Security vendors.
We monitor all Virtualization Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
