We performed a comparison between Bizagi and OutSystems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Low-Code Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Its cost is the most valuable. It is not as expensive. It is also easy to make different types of processes for the users."
"I like the ease of use and the fact that you can download and use their free version, which is unlimited. However, while it's unlimited use, some features aren't available."
"It is easy to use and easy to learn. It is also fully compatible with BPMN virtual tool. Bizagi is very fast in responding to and fixing the issues."
"It has an easy to use interface which final users accepted with much more enthusiasm than our ERP (SAP)."
"Bizagi is really great for beginners because it's user-friendly and you can learn in it quickly, whereas other similar software are harder."
"In Bizagi, all of the features are valuable."
"The user logic is very easy to understand, even for people who are not engineers nor developers."
"It can be useful as a tool to improve your communications and the control of your processes. For example, when you have to explain a process to seven or eight stakeholders who think differently as well as have different experiences in different functional departments, it is not easy. Sometimes you are using a lot of technical terms, and other times, you are dealing with management terminology. The visual representation helps you create a better alignment and understanding for different roles and stakeholders of your workforce."
"Refactoring with TrueChange is very simple."
"The scalability of OutSystems is very good, it scales automatically very useful for us."
"The most valuable feature of OutSystems is the drag and drop and toolchains in the small AI developing environment. Additionally, the documentation is helpful."
"Our previous solution had other overheads such as release management, version management, code management, monitoring, etc., all of which are built-in with OutSystems."
"There is literally a ton of stuff it can do. It's very flexible."
"I like the mobile features the most, and there are also various features around the portal we created that I enjoy."
"It provides for faster development and better software releases."
"It is a stable solution, and the initial setup is straightforward."
"Bizagi could be improved by more automation and machine learning. Now that I'm learning more about data analyzers, I'm realizing that many people have problems with data and how to understand them."
"I would like to see more in terms of analytics and better reporting."
"The solution was very limited."
"Bizagi allows for automation, but it's very complicated."
"From a developer's point of view, an improvement in the layout would make the UI better."
"The free version could be better. Some of the templates and all the functionalities aren't available in the free version. I've been trying to check some maps, for example, organizational maps or a model on organization hierarchy. Apparently, there seems to be no template. You have to create your own. I am not sure if there are templates, but I've not really seen any. I think that there's room for improvement."
"I would like to see simulation as a free feature again. In version 3.3 it was free, but in 4.0 it isn't."
"The solution needs to make it easier to use RPA products on it. They may need an RPA specific interface. It would be better than having to make an RPA tool to use for viewing. Most of our work is about making RPA tools with the Bizagi, not using Bizagi itself."
"We have performance issues while fetching bulk data."
"I have difficulty in using several new features. Some of the product's features are tricky to use as well."
"Since we first started using OutSystems, they switched their language support from Java and .NET to .NET only, which was a bit of a surprise. Their language support could be better in this sense, although on our resource side it is now a bit more flexible."
"The product could be improved if there was a shortcut, or predefined, predictable templates provided."
"I would like to see OutSystems improve its integration capabilities, especially with emerging technologies like AI and GPT."
"The PDD framework can't be used for the behavioral-driven development way of working."
"The tutorials for the solution should be updated."
"The tool needs to improve the efficiency of its widgets."
Bizagi is ranked 10th in Low-Code Development Platforms with 78 reviews while OutSystems is ranked 3rd in Low-Code Development Platforms with 46 reviews. Bizagi is rated 8.4, while OutSystems is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend ". Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, Microsoft Power Apps and Apache Airflow, whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and QuickBase. See our Bizagi vs. OutSystems report.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors and best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.