We performed a comparison between BlazeMeter and Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Load Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I really like the recording because when I use the JMeter the scripting a lot of recording it takes me a lot of time to get used to. The BlazeMeter the recording is quick."
"The on-the-fly test data improved our testing productivity a lot. The new test data features changed how we test the applications because there are different things we can do. We can use mock data or real data. We can also build data based on different formats."
"With the help of the Mock Services, we are overcoming everything. Wherever we are facing issues, whether they will be long term or temporary, by implementing the Mock Services we can bypass the faulty components that are not needed for our particular testing."
"BlazeMeter can be used for both API and performance testing, it is a multi-facility tool."
"BlazeMeter's most valuable feature is its cloud-based platform for performance testing."
"The stability is good."
"BlazeMeter has allowed us to simplify and speed up our load testing process."
"They have good support documentation and when we have contacted them, they helped to guide us."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"A possible improvement could be the integration with APM tools."
"The product currently doesn't allow users to run parallel thread groups, making it an area that should be considered for improvement."
"The seamless integration with mobiles could be improved."
"In terms of improvement, I would like to have the ability to customize reports."
"My only complaint is about the technical support, where sometimes I found that they would not read into and understand the details of my question before answering it."
"The performance could be better. When reviewing finished cases, it sometimes takes a while for BlazeMeter to load. That has improved recently, but it's still a problem with unusually large test cases. The same goes for editing test cases. When editing test cases, it starts to take a long time to open those action groups and stuff."
"The should be some visibility into load testing. I'd like to capture items via snapshots."
"The Timeline Report panel has no customization options. One feature that I missed was not having a time filter, which I had in ELK. For example, there are only filter requests for a time of less than 5 seconds."
"A lot of time you start the stress testing, and you sign the log in again, and I want to get rid of that. It's just not clear to me how to do it yet."
More Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing Pricing and Cost Advice →
BlazeMeter is ranked 4th in Load Testing Tools with 41 reviews while Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is ranked 16th in Load Testing Tools with 3 reviews. BlazeMeter is rated 8.2, while Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of BlazeMeter writes "Reduced our test operating costs, provides quick feedback, and helps us understand how to build better test cases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing writes "User-friendly, cheap, and quick to set up". BlazeMeter is most compared with Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, OpenText LoadRunner Professional and BrowserStack, whereas Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is most compared with Apache JMeter. See our BlazeMeter vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing report.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.