We performed a comparison between BMC Helix Cloud Security and Mirantis Container Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."As a frequently audited company, we value PingSafe's compliance monitoring features. They give us a report with a compliance score for how well we meet certain regulatory standards, like HIPAA. We can show our compliance as a percentage. It's also a way to show that we are serious about security."
"We use the infrastructure as code scanning, which is good."
"PingSafe can integrate all your cloud accounts and resources you create in the AWS account, We have set it up to scan the AWS transfer services, EC2, security groups, and GitHub."
"It saves time, makes your environment more secure, and improves compliance. PingSafe helps with audits, ensuring that you are following best practices for cloud security. You don't need to be an expert to use it and improve your security."
"The management console is highly intuitive to comprehend and operate."
"It is pretty easy to integrate with this platform. When properly integrated, it monitors end-to-end."
"The solution's most valuable features are its ability to detect vulnerabilities inside AWS resources and its ability to rescan after a specific duration set by the administrator."
"Cloud Native Security's best feature is its ability to identify hard-coded secrets during pull request reviews."
"The features that I've found most valuable are its container security aspect. I also like its vulnerability management tools."
"The most valuable aspects of BMC Helix Cloud Security are its security features and regulatory compliance capabilities."
"The cool feature of Helix Cloud Security is that you can do all that — understand and remediate issues — in one dashboard, based on the different policies that are available for security, out-of-the-box."
"It's also multi-cloud. You can look at several cloud providers: AWS, Azure, or GCP."
"Role-based security is a valuable feature."
"The best feature is time to value. With very minimal effort, you are able to have a cohesive view into your security posture on one or multiple cloud accounts, particularly if you are dealing with multicloud. If you have Azure and AWS deployments, you might have multiple subscriptions in Azure and usually multiple accounts in AWS. You may even be doing some GCP work (around Google Cloud Platform). It's very difficult to manage a common set of policies, even less reporting, across multiple subscriptions, accounts, and cloud environments. What BMC Helix Cloud Security does is provide a unified view or single pane of glass as to your baseline. Then, it also facilitates the ability for Level 1 or 2 operations support to take action and report on security vulnerabilities."
"You need to make an architectural runway before actually starting to implement Docker Compose, especially in a distributed environment."
"Very easy solution to use as it is intuitive."
"If we compare legacy application support to Docker, it's a superior product."
"Now it is easier to set up the development environment and also to test the applications on the pipelines."
"I like the automation in deployment. I can deploy whenever I want based on the environment, and I can easily roll back to a previous version for testing."
"The solution is scalable and we have plans to increase usage in the future."
"The most valuable aspect is the excellent support. In addition, the billing system is really easy to understand."
"It is a stable solution. It is nearly perfect. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"With Cloud Native Security, we can't selectively enable or disable alerts based on our specific use case."
"Customized queries should be made easier to improve PingSafe."
"Whenever I view the processes and the process aspect, it takes a long time to load."
"In addition to our telecom and Slack channels, it would be helpful to receive Cloud Native Security security notifications in Microsoft Teams."
"When we get a new finding from PingSafe, I wish we could get an alert in the console, so we can work on it before we see it in the report. It would be very useful for the team that is actively working on the PingSafe platform, so we can close the issue the same day before it appears in the daily report."
"The categorization of the results from the vulnerability assessment could be improved."
"After closing an alert in Cloud Native Security, it still shows as unresolved."
"It does not bring much threat intel from the outside world. All it does is scan. If it can also correlate things, it will be better."
"The UI could be more user-friendly."
"BMC Helix Cloud Security has room for improvement in terms of integrating its various features."
"We've had some with issues connectors. The connectors have seemed to have caused a little bit of trouble, perhaps with the APIs trying to scan the environment. The only time I've had to reach out to tech support was for that. It seems it may not have been scanning correctly or I wasn't seeing data within a specific time. But we've set up a couple of connectors in the past couple of weeks and they actually scanned the AWS environment and we had data within about 10 minutes. It's working a lot faster and I think they're making improvements as they go."
"I want the role-based security feature to be improved."
"Every organization out there doesn't rely on just one control body. They use FISMA control. They may use HIPAA, CIS, PCI, or SOX, then blend them. One of the things that is now in big demand for BMC Helix Cloud Security is content. That's the next journey in its lifespan, making it easier for the community to share and collaborate on content for security controls that can be measured and remediated."
"More integrations with other platforms would be beneficial."
"I feel that the product lacks to offer a proper health status of the images which are running, making it an area where improvements are required."
"There could be an automation feature included in the product. It will speed up application processes and will not require scripting codes."
"There are a couple of things. Firstly, the vaultStore database within Container isn't as efficient as a standalone Container vault. This needs improvement."
"The orchestration and tracing should be improved."
"I find Docker easier to use, but I gave it to an inexperienced developer and it took him a lot of time to understand."
"I would also like to see more features inside Docker as well as more integration with different solutions."
"It will be better if the product provides dynamic load-balancing capabilities."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
BMC Helix Cloud Security is ranked 25th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 5 reviews while Mirantis Container Cloud is ranked 1st in Container Virtualization with 29 reviews. BMC Helix Cloud Security is rated 8.0, while Mirantis Container Cloud is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of BMC Helix Cloud Security writes "A highly scalable and straightforward solution with a knowledgeable support team". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mirantis Container Cloud writes "An easy-to-manage solution that helps to manage web pages ". BMC Helix Cloud Security is most compared with Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, VMware Aria Operations, Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform and CloudBolt, whereas Mirantis Container Cloud is most compared with SUSE Rancher. See our BMC Helix Cloud Security vs. Mirantis Container Cloud report.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.