We performed a comparison between Camunda and ProcessMaker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."
"Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment."
"We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before."
"It is open-source. It supports microservice orchestration. This is what we are really interested in. We can customize our products depending on the use cases."
"Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible."
"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."
"We can share, discuss, and develop the model together — from a distance. It's really helped us during these times of isolation."
"The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it."
"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."
"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."
"The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself."
"Without a proper frontend, the business cannot effectively use the platform."
"The product's initial setup phase is difficult for beginners."
"When building interfaces, there are limited tools to work with, especially when dealing with different types of tasks, such as user tasks and system tasks."
"They could provide more documentation regarding the integration of different programming languages."
"Camunda could be improved by making it easier to modify a process. You can program it to follow a process, but it is difficult to modify the process when the application is in use. It could also be improved by making it easier to use the visual platform without needing to be informed on that. Sometimes, we programmers haven't used it in the past, and it's a bit difficult to learn it."
"I think that Camunda can try to do better when it comes to solving the complexities of all the products in its software stack."
"If Camunda could develop something that creates user forms that would be a great feature to have. They also need to improve the UI."
"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."
"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while ProcessMaker is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while ProcessMaker is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas ProcessMaker is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bonita, Appian and Bizagi. See our Camunda vs. ProcessMaker report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.