We performed a comparison between Centerity Monitor and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The machine learning feature is valuable."
"The implementation process is very straightforward."
"Our customers also like that they don't have to use multiple modules. Micro Focus and major vendors typically require you to buy several modules and plugins. Our customers do not like that. We offer them a single product for all their monitoring needs."
"The flexible licensing model is one of the solution's most valuable aspects. It really allows for great flexibility for companies."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides network segregation for server monitoring."
"The most valuable feature is the alert and alarm monitoring."
"It not only provides the preconfigured item monitoring feature, but it is also easy to configure custom items."
"I really enjoy network traffic triggers that allow us to check traffic threshold from ISP."
"The solution's design has recently changed and it is visually pleasing with more color, for example, there is blue, black, and white."
"They can improve the functionality that provides some numbers related to the behavior of the metrics."
"When using this solution in enterprise monitoring, you are able to see that there are some issues with equipment that could be causing a problem. Sometimes you want to make a root command that you do not want to be executed automatically. What we have tried to do is open an SSH session directly from the solution's interface but it is not possible."
"To improve Zabbix, adding more features to support the monitoring of modern workloads like containers would be beneficial."
"Outside of the normal standard monitoring, I would like to extend patching, importing patching, and supporting patching for Windows Servers."
"We would like to see the addition of automatic push functionality to this product. This would save time when monitoring our servers and networks as, at present, we have to manually install the Zabbix agent on any hardware to be monitored."
"The main problem with Zabbix is that you have to spend time writing templates for all of the products that you have."
"The graphical user interface could be customized a little bit more, and also the dashboard could be more friendly."
"Implementing Zabbix is difficult. I've deployed many solutions over the years, and Zabbix is the hardest to implement. You have to do some development to get it to work with IBM, Micro Focus, or HP products."
"The documentation gets a bit messy between versions and is not too detailed, which is a bit painful for first-timers, especially when they run into issues."
Earn 20 points
Centerity Monitor is ranked 68th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while Zabbix is ranked 1st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 101 reviews. Centerity Monitor is rated 7.0, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Centerity Monitor writes "A user-friendly solution that comes with a valuable machine learning feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Centerity Monitor is most compared with Nagios XI, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core and Nagios XI. See our Centerity Monitor vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.