We performed a comparison between Check Point Remote Access VPN and Claroty Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Microsoft, Citrix and others in Remote Access."We use it to connect our sites. We have a couple of sites that need to interconnect."
"Our number of users working remotely vastly increased during the COVID 19 pandemic. Check Point Remote Access VPN allowed us to quickly make the transition from in-office to remote work."
"Setup using the manuals was easy."
"For a basic setup, implementation is quite easy."
"The secure hotspot access for enabling good network connectivity is great."
"It can improve an organization by providing secure access to resources for traveling employees, which can help to reduce the risk of data breaches or other security incidents."
"The management of the solution is very simple. It allows for a single view of all the endpoints."
"Access is browser-based only and requires no additional client installation."
"The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts."
"You have no ability to reserve a total number of licenses. The VPN user licenses are assigned per gateway, and if you enable MEP function is not so easy to size the gateway licenses."
"The interface itself needs improvement. When you need to create something, you have to go through a lot of steps. It needs to be simplified."
"I cannot see the full effect of the endpoint solution because it relies on having access to the DNF queries, which might not go through the Check Point firewall when you're using it for perimeter networks. Check Point will not identify the actual source of the net queries. This may be related to the architecture, however, and not poor product issues. I don't know if it can be improved on the Check Point side or not."
"This is the best version we are using, however, if some changes can be made in the next release, I'd like to see adjustments to the time period and internet connectivity."
"The Linux version may have an app (similar to Windows) instead of a shell script."
"The non-standard setup is quite complex as you have to do changes via GUI and CLI."
"Sometimes the application slows down the computing device, and this affects workflows."
"The client-side UI is fundamental, and there is nothing to see."
"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 5th in Remote Access with 61 reviews while Claroty Platform is ranked 23rd in Remote Access with 1 review. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while Claroty Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Claroty Platform writes "Provides good visibility of the devices in a user's environment". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, whereas Claroty Platform is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Tenable OT Security, Dragos, Darktrace and Armis.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.