We performed a comparison between Cisco Enterprise Routers and Juniper MX Series Routers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Routers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"Cisco has one of the best products in terms of routing because of the protocols in which they provide."
"The solution's initial setup process is easy."
"The routing feature is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"Cisco is a good product that is stable."
"Its performance and stability are most valuable. We are using it for the last five years, and it is constantly up. It didn't create any problems for us."
"We appreciate that this solution performs well, regardless of the volume of traffic being fed through it."
"I think Cisco Enterprise Routers are excellent."
"The most valuable features are security and throughput."
"The performance is good."
"I think that the extensions are very valuable. The way you can test the configuration before applying that configuration permanently is very helpful. The rollback configuration is also very useful."
"The most valuable features for us were related to our transition into MPLS technology, specifically for BPN and VPN services."
"We are able to easily build chassis with Juniper MX Series Routers."
"The solution's main features are its security and ease of use."
"The most valuable feature is the capacity of the throughput for the firewall."
"Users are able to easily configure the whole solution via simple data."
"The most valuable feature is the standard routing protocol."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Their support has room for improvement. The regional agents are not that great."
"The UI could be more user-friendly."
"The security of the solution could be a bit better."
"While scalability is available, it must be paid for."
"The price has room for improvement."
"The automation capabilities need improvement."
"The solution is not easy to manage for people that do not have the experience."
"The product would be more scalable if it could operate with other brands."
"Finding market expertise is hard."
"We'd appreciate it if they had a better GUI. It would be more flexible for the customers that way."
"The pricing is a bit too high."
"Currently, I don't have specific concerns or ideas for improvement. Regarding functionalities, I appreciate the user interface of Juniper Elite. Additionally, I'm exploring the use of Juniper Routers in a Parliament environment, particularly with Baragon, and so far, I find it to be a valuable feature. We're currently facing an issue as we're in the process of building and dealing with the software, specifically transitioning from R2 to RC. It's like when there is an update in the routers, and in the process, there are chances to end up losing some of your settings. The challenge arises because the recommended configurations for RC do not align with our features, necessitating a reevaluation of many features. It would have been more efficient if the initial recommendation had been for RC, avoiding the need to redo our research. This has resulted in a loss of time for us, and we've encountered this situation multiple times."
"The only thing that might need improvement would be the occasional downtime."
"Automation can also be improved."
"One thing that the product can do better is clustering. Rather than just having two of them, it would help if there was one cluster to extend to more notes in the cluster itself."
"The solution could improve by providing enhancements to built-in SDN or SDWAN."
Cisco Enterprise Routers is ranked 2nd in Routers with 101 reviews while Juniper MX Series Routers is ranked 3rd in Routers with 33 reviews. Cisco Enterprise Routers is rated 8.6, while Juniper MX Series Routers is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cisco Enterprise Routers writes "Allows us to configure NAS through Cisco activities and to create GRE channels with different sites". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper MX Series Routers writes "Good performance, long life span, and easy to set up". Cisco Enterprise Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Huawei Enterprise Routers, HPE Enterprise Routers, OneAccess Enterprise Routers and MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, whereas Juniper MX Series Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Huawei Enterprise Routers, MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, HPE Enterprise Routers and ExtremeRouting. See our Cisco Enterprise Routers vs. Juniper MX Series Routers report.
See our list of best Routers vendors.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
