We performed a comparison between Cisco SD-WAN and FatPipe SD-WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions."There have been no issues with stability."
"The solution is good to use and easy to handle and manage from the centralized location or from the cloud."
"I have found the performance and the Zero-Touch provisioning helpful which makes it easier for us to develop."
"The most valuable features in Cisco SD-WAN are the QoS, AI, and simple interface for users to access."
"Cisco SD-WAN is a very good product."
"The user experience is pretty good."
"Cisco SD-WAN's best features are the development of network links, application control, and bandwidth monitoring."
"The solution has great scalability."
"The most valuable feature of FatPipe SD-WAN is it's based on SD-WAN technology."
"When it comes to adding more security features, you need to add more RAM."
"Since most user-data is going through the solution, we are concerned about security, as all the information is in the cloud and not on-premises. The user data authentification should be higher to better prevent malicious attacks."
"Simplifying the definition and implementation could add significant value, as it can be complex due to multiple product integrations and customization requirements."
"The solution could be a bit cheaper."
"It is the best solution that I ever had, but there might be something better than this in the future."
"An area for improvement lies in enhancing the integration with the security functions of the SD-WAN."
"The solution is a bit complicated."
"We recently found some bugs."
"FatPipe SD-WAN can improve the price to scale the solution."
Cisco SD-WAN is ranked 1st in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 86 reviews while FatPipe SD-WAN is ranked 16th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 1 review. Cisco SD-WAN is rated 8.0, while FatPipe SD-WAN is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco SD-WAN writes "A solution for integrating services to enhance up-time, performance and lower costs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of FatPipe SD-WAN writes "Beneficial technology, reliable, and simple deployment". Cisco SD-WAN is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Meraki SD-WAN, VMware SD-WAN, Juniper Session Smart Router and Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform, whereas FatPipe SD-WAN is most compared with VMware SD-WAN and Fortinet FortiGate.
See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.