We performed a comparison between Cisco SD-WAN and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions."It is very simple and easy to manage, compared to other methods."
"Huge companies use SD-WAN. It is largely scalable."
"Customizing SD-WAN is very easy because you can define two colors. You can define two different operators. You can deploy a partial mesh, a full mesh, or hub-and-spoke totally differently. If you want to do this on a DMVPN solution, that's really hard."
"The deployment is quite simple and straightforward."
"Cisco SD-WAN's best features are the development of network links, application control, and bandwidth monitoring."
"The technical support is very responsive."
"Cisco SD-WAN's collaborative features are unique and sustainable. I also like the protocols, which use two SD-WAN."
"It is very simple to deploy. It's a point-and-click type of deployment, so it's fairly simple."
"The features that are most valuable are the identification, scan features, and the identification of vulnerabilities."
"Technical support is fantastic."
"It is quite easy to implement."
"There are many features. Its reliability, ease of installation, ease of use, and the richness of the information provided are the most valuable features."
"It's stable and quite reliable."
"It's really beneficial for scanning and interacting with the agent."
"It's very configurable to adjust impact to systems."
"I like Qualys because it is a very complete product, more so than Tenable."
"Cisco SD-WAN's clustering mechanism needs to be improved. If there are more than five milliseconds of latency time between installations of the VM manager, the cluster automatically breaks down."
"Simplifying the definition and implementation could add significant value, as it can be complex due to multiple product integrations and customization requirements."
"Since Cisco acquired Viptela, the stability of this solution has given problems since it is quite new."
"Technical support could be more helpful and responsive."
"I would like to see features related to security compliance, including a view of compliance with standards. With this, I should be able to do an audit of my network with SDWAN."
"It's an expensive solution."
"The whole solution needs to be re-imagined. It's quite complex right now and really needs to be simplified to make it easier for those of us using it. It should offer more simplified management as well."
"We have found that their SD-WAN has a lot of scope for improvement."
"It's too early for me to say if there is any room for improvement since we're in the first couple of months of using this solution."
"We face issues while scanning multiple assets."
"It is a struggle to be able to pull our report and to be able to do onboarding using automated tools."
"Sometimes we face a problem with accessing the tool and not getting an expected result. From a technology point of view, they need to look into this."
"Could use additional security for the app."
"I would like to see this solution simplified to work more easily in a multi-cloud environment."
"I would like to see more accuracy in detections, better reporting capabilities, and better dashboard download capabilities."
"Endpoint stability and fault resolution could be improved."
Cisco SD-WAN is ranked 1st in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 86 reviews while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews. Cisco SD-WAN is rated 8.0, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco SD-WAN writes "A solution for integrating services to enhance up-time, performance and lower costs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". Cisco SD-WAN is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Meraki SD-WAN, VMware SD-WAN, Juniper Session Smart Router and Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.