Citrix Hypervisor vs Oracle VM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Citrix Logo
10,846 views|7,639 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
15,585 views|11,124 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Citrix Hypervisor and Oracle VM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Server Virtualization Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Citrix Hypervisor vs. Oracle VM Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Felipe Domingos
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"What I like the most is the support of the GPU Graphics and the VM Live migration.""The core function enables multiple virtual machines to run on a single physical server. This maximizes hardware utilization and efficiency.""The initial setup is easy.""This is a good product for virtualization and it is easy to use.""This is a dependable solution for virtualization with a good community for product support.""Citrix Hypervisor is quick to deploy and easy to manage.""The solution is extremely user friendly.""The most valuable features are being able to host many virtual machines and being able to patch machines."

More Citrix Hypervisor Pros →

"Cloning is the best feature in Oracle VM.""What I like best about this product is that it's free.""Overall, the biggest performance is around virtualization and automation, you can build private clouds with Oracle VM using Enterprise Manager.""Oracle VM is user-friendly and facilitates compliance with Oracle Licensing, a feature not provided by competitors like VMware or Hyper-V. Oracle prefers customers to use their technology. It is also easy to implement, clone, and deploy machines with Oracle VM, making it a convenient solution.""Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""The network capabilities are good.""The ability to live migrate VMs on the fly from one hypervisor to another has been very useful.""The biggest advantage of Oracle VM is that you can separate your clusters to get your licenses agreement in scope."

More Oracle VM Pros →

Cons
"It needs to have a more robust backup solution.""The product could be faster and licensing options could be improved.""The licensing costs are too high on the solution. They should work to make the costs more reasonable.""Assigning the order of virtual server startup is not very easy and this can be improved.""You need a licensed account to look up technical support.""The solution would benefit from faster technical support.""The solution should be more flexible and allow for greater customization.""Citrix could provide more tools to help the client manage the solution because we need to build our own tools in some cases. Everything is available through PowerShell, but then you need to build your own scripts to do the more advanced work."

More Citrix Hypervisor Cons →

"With our current OVM Manager version, migrating a VM from one repository to another repository was really complicated, especially editing and manually matching the configuration.""The only improvement needed for Oracle VM is the look and feel of the interface.""I've found that using Oracle VM is like stepping back in time. It's not kept up with technology. The only reason anyone uses it is that they're afraid of Oracle's licensing. Oracle has a tremendously bad licensing approach.""The solution needs more features and flexibility in terms of communicating with other platforms. If it had that, it would be the perfect product.""An expanded data transfer option is one of the features I would like to have added.""The solution is at its end of life and is about to be discontinued.""I think more Command-Line options for the product, for deployments.""Productivity in Oracle VM could still be improved, and an additional feature to make the product better is compatibility with Kubernetes and other modern technologies."

More Oracle VM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing and licensing is so important. Customers do consider the price seriously."
  • "The most valuable feature is the cost; it is a free product."
  • "To subscribe to the paid version with support, it is approximately $6,000 per year."
  • "There are free and paid versions. The free version is limited in features but not by time limit. The paid version has more features."
  • "While it is free for small networks, the pricing is high if your network grows past a certain size."
  • "We migrated from VMware to XenCenter to cut costs."
  • "This solution is open source, it's free."
  • "Citrix is a good low-cost alternative to VMware, so if budgeting is an issue then I would recommend it."
  • More Citrix Hypervisor Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Oracle's VM VirtualBox is a powerful, free, and open-source virtualization tool."
  • "The cost of scalability. You pay for what you use. It's free to download, free to install, and the support side has been very helpful."
  • "The price of this product is high."
  • "If you buy an Oracle server, this solution is free. You have to only pay for support."
  • "The cost of this solution is cheap. It is one of the reasons we chose Oracle VM. It is truly "pocket- friendly.""
  • "Pricing and licensing is one of the main decision making reasons for going to Oracle VM because it was cost effective."
  • "Oracle VM is free if you are running it on Oracle infrastructure hardware, otherwise, it is subscription-based."
  • "Licensing costs are less for Oracle Linux and for clients moving to the Oracle Cloud, as it is included in the price of the subscription."
  • More Oracle VM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Thang Le Toan (Victory Lee)
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The core function enables multiple virtual machines to run on a single physical server. This maximizes hardware utilization and efficiency.
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, with one being very inexpensive and ten being very expensive.
    Top Answer:It is a scalable product and provides great benefits for virtualization needs. However, there are a few considerations: * Cost: Citrix Hypervisor can be fairly expensive. * Complexity: There's a… more »
    Top Answer:I would prefer if KVM was easier to scale and not so limited. Overall the product has been helpful. It is easy to use, and was quite straight-forward to set up. Since I have been using KVM, I have not… more »
    Top Answer:Oracle VM seems to me to be kind of outdated. Nevertheless, it is fairly straightforward to use and maintain. The solution can just be set and you can forget about it, and the scalability is… more »
    Top Answer:If you want to access the VM from anywhere over the Internet, you put it in a public subnet. So, VMs are linked to that. The subnets are linked to it. So, it's perfectly secured if it's a private… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    10,846
    Comparisons
    7,639
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    580
    Rating
    8.8
    Views
    15,585
    Comparisons
    11,124
    Reviews
    18
    Average Words per Review
    422
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    VMware vSphere logo
    Compared 35% of the time.
    KVM logo
    Compared 19% of the time.
    Oracle VM VirtualBox logo
    Compared 17% of the time.
    Proxmox VE logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    IBM PowerVM logo
    Compared 0% of the time.
    Also Known As
    XenServer
    Learn More
    Overview

    Citrix Hypervisor is a leading virtualization management platform optimized for application, desktop and server virtualization infrastructures. Consolidation and containment of workloads on Citrix Hypervisor enables organizations of any vertical or size to transform their business IT compute infrastructures.

    Oracle VM for x86

    Oracle VM for x86 is a Xen based server virtualization platform for public and private cloud and traditional on premise deployment. Oracle VM offers full lifecycle and application deployment from disk to cloud.

    Designed and optimized for security, efficiency and performance Oracle VM supports major hardware vendors x86 and storage platforms and can run workloads on Linux, Windows and Oracle Solaris. Uniquely for our virtualization platform it offers live patching via Ksplice enhancing security and minimizing service disruption. Oracle VM supports hard partitioning which can significantly reduce software applications licensing costs.

    Oracle VM for SPARC

    Oracle VM for SPARC is a firmware based virtualization platform for Oracle and Fujitsu SPARC based servers running Solaris. Oracle VM supports hard partitioning which can significantly reduce software applications licensing costs.

    Sample Customers
    U.S. Army Shared Services Center, SoftLayer, Educational Services of America, Independent Bank, and SK Telecom.
    Ambulance Victoria, Australian Finance Group (AFG), Avnet Technology Solutions, CERN, cloudKleyer, Danish Tax Authority (SKAT), Data Intensity, Dubai World, Engineers Australia, Enkitec, Groupe FLO, Guerra S.A. Implemento, s Rodovišrios, Interactive One, IT Convergence, Jesta Digital, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, KT, Kyoto Prefecture, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory / National Ignition Facility, Multinet Pakistan, National Australia Bank (NAB), Navis LLC, Overhead Door, Overstock.com, Paragon Data, Parks Victoria, Pella, Sunway Shared Services, St. Louis Metro, Terminales Ro de la Plata S.A., University of Massachusetts, Versace,
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Non Tech Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization48%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Government5%
    Comms Service Provider4%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Consumer Goods Company7%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization45%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise31%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise55%
    Large Enterprise29%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise52%
    Large Enterprise33%
    Buyer's Guide
    Citrix Hypervisor vs. Oracle VM
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix Hypervisor vs. Oracle VM and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Citrix Hypervisor is ranked 8th in Server Virtualization Software with 46 reviews while Oracle VM is ranked 7th in Server Virtualization Software with 78 reviews. Citrix Hypervisor is rated 8.2, while Oracle VM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Citrix Hypervisor writes "Allows us to allocate CPU, memory, storage, and network resources across VMs and minimizes downtime in case of hardware failure or maintenance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle VM writes "A cheap option available for Linux environments which is useful for many workloads". Citrix Hypervisor is most compared with Proxmox VE, VMware vSphere, Hyper-V, KVM and VMware Workstation, whereas Oracle VM is most compared with VMware vSphere, KVM, Oracle VM VirtualBox, Proxmox VE and IBM PowerVM. See our Citrix Hypervisor vs. Oracle VM report.

    See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.

    We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.