We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Talend Open Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."
"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."
"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."
"No dependence on native language and ease of use."
"Talend can connect to multiple data sources, including relational data sources, ERP, CRM, and others."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"We're able to handle large amounts of data with ease."
"The Talend Studio connected to the Talend MDM (Master Data Management) is the most valuable feature. Talend Studio is used to create a job stream that connects to multiple data sources, matches, compares or creates a golden record for overall identification. It also has a good catalogue of objects that can be dragged and dropped for building models."
"The rapidity of integration with data may be one of the valuable features."
"This solution has improved our overall time to value for data ingestion."
"We're sold on the customization part of the solution."
"The API integration and big data approach are very good because of how you extract data from JSP files or big data web repositories like MongoDB."
"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."
"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."
"Its documentation could be improved."
"The price for Talend Data Integration should be less expensive."
"The server-side should be completely revamped."
"The technical support and documentation need a lot of work to come up to standard."
"I would say that writing to JSON is kind of a pain. It reads from a JSON file pretty well, but writing to a JSON file is not so great because its components are not good."
"Multiple products are there within the product suite. That can be actually trimmed down."
"I rate Talend Open Studio's stability an eight out of ten. Talend has some problems sometimes."
"Technical support and customer service need to be improved."
"If I compare Open Studion to other solutions, their interface is robust but not so fancy looking. This is an area that could use improvement. I would like to see an updated interface."
Earn 20 points
CloverETL is ranked 61st in Data Integration while Talend Open Studio is ranked 5th in Data Integration with 48 reviews. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while Talend Open Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Talend Open Studio writes "Intuitive interface and documentation make it simple to build jobs and APIs and logging helps pinpoint and resolve issues quickly". CloverETL is most compared with SSIS and iWay Universal Adapter Framework, whereas Talend Open Studio is most compared with SSIS, IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Talend Data Fabric, Talend Data Management Platform and Informatica PowerCenter. See our CloverETL vs. Talend Open Studio report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.