We performed a comparison between Collibra Governance and SAS Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance."It enables a linear view of the data assets across different levels, providing a comprehensive understanding."
"It's not a complicated product."
"Collibra Governance is a stable solution."
"From the perspective of a data user, the solution has a great search capability."
"This solution is user friendly and offers multiple functionalities. It operates like a kind of a repository that allows you to find anything about a particular data set or field."
"I find the metadata feature valuable because it replaces the coding."
"It helps us build a powerful workflow mechanism where there can be any stewardship, including issue management governing assets using policies, regulations, or business rules."
"The end-to-end solution itself is great. The most valuable is the workload feature that Collibra offers. There is a vast amount of flexibility in terms of how much we can customize. It gives us a lot of options to implement for a lot of purposes."
"It is a very professional product. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Occasionally we get little bugs that occur, however, this is typical."
"Where it isn't great is on older technologies that you'll typically find in finance or insurance industries, such as older types of data with VSAM or ISAM, or those types of older technologies. It just doesn't connect with them very easily."
"From a usability perspective, customers usually find some areas of the solution a bit complex. It takes a long time for the customers to get used to the UI and the interface."
"We are not able to ingest all the data in Collibra, and that's why we cannot do element-to-element level data tracking."
"Collibra is not very user-friendly in terms of lineage generation. The lineage generation process is quite tough, and it takes lots of time to understand it. Business staff are also struggling to generate lineages and to understand them. So, it is not very user-friendly."
"There are a lot of gaps in Collibra's support and documentation."
"The UI is good if you happen to be an administrator and are familiar with the technical side of the administration. If you're a business user, the UI is not good. It is hard to learn. It is hard for those who are administering it to teach to end-users and it can take hours of training to do it. Because it is difficult and non-intuitive, business users resist using it. It is a battle to get them on board and to keep them engaged because of the UI."
"If someone changes the metadata, we can't see who changed it."
"In today's time, to be competitive, the solution's price should be lowered."
Collibra Governance is ranked 2nd in Data Governance with 41 reviews while SAS Data Governance is ranked 15th in Data Governance with 1 review. Collibra Governance is rated 7.6, while SAS Data Governance is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Collibra Governance writes "Transformed our cross-functional business teams into one enterprise-facing view". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Data Governance writes "An exceptionally stable and scalable product that helps businesses in the area of data integrity". Collibra Governance is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Governance, Informatica Axon, Alation Data Catalog, BigID and Ataccama ONE Platform, whereas SAS Data Governance is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.