We performed a comparison between Corelight and Darktrace based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the embedded IDS from Suricata."
"It is easy to deploy and easy to handle."
"It's easy to create additional dashboards specific to supporting specific tasks."
"Corelight is easy to use."
"It's an easy way for us to get visibility in a client's environment."
"The active threat dashboard is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"What I like about Darktrace, is that you can quickly identify threats."
"It provides a comprehensive, detailed view of network activity and whatever is happening inside it."
"The main valuable feature is that we don't need a lot of analysts. With few analysts, we have all the network monitored, 24/7."
"The most valuable feature of Darktrace and the most valuable feature is the artificial intelligence module because that is the tool that determines automatically if there is any risk or not in the network."
"Darktrace's most valuable features are that it understands the network environment and is able to trace the traffic and alert on anomalies."
"We are able to detect a lot of things, actually, and see what is happening in our network."
"The most valuable feature has been the behavioral analytics that allows us to monitor all the traffic."
"In the next release, building a graphical user interface would be helpful."
"They can enhance the interface of the product. They can make it more interactive and also easier to use for feature access."
"The solution’s architecture is complex and difficult to understand. There are multiple machines and VMs."
"Machine learning could be a good improvement, but it's very costly."
"Corelight hasn’t added features in a long time."
"Darkforce could be improved in the range of the interface; how to interact with the actions it's taking or not taking."
"I did not use the AI features because they should make it more user-friendly which would be a benefit. Additionally, the solution could integrate with more SIEM or SOAR tools."
"Needs to improve its collaboration with local partners."
"I would like to see more protection in the endpoint. Especially because we have a lot of people using VPNs. If they would improve end point security, it would give more control there."
"I think there is some MSSP missing."
"The program is quite expensive."
"Darktrace does not have any capabilities to configure."
"The cost is a bit on the higher side."
Corelight is ranked 7th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) with 5 reviews while Darktrace is ranked 1st in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) with 65 reviews. Corelight is rated 9.0, while Darktrace is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Corelight writes "An open-source solution that gave us insight into our clients' network traffic flow ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Darktrace writes "Great autonomous support, offers an easy setup, and has responsive support". Corelight is most compared with ExtraHop Reveal(x), Vectra AI, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Arista NDR and SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer, whereas Darktrace is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Vectra AI, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response. See our Corelight vs. Darktrace report.
See our list of best Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) vendors.
We monitor all Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.