We performed a comparison between CoreOS Clair and SUSE NeuVector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Container Security."The management console is the most valuable feature."
"Cloud Native Security is a tool that has good monitoring features."
"Support has been very helpful and provides regular feedback and help whenever needed. They've been very useful."
"When creating cloud infrastructure, Cloud Native Security evaluates the cloud security parameters and how they will impact the organization's risk. It lets us know whether our security parameter conforms to international industry standards. It alerts us about anything that increases our risk, so we can address those vulnerabilities and prevent attacks."
"The UI is responsive and user-friendly."
"PingSafe offers three key features: vulnerability management notifications, cloud configuration assistance, and security scanning."
"We really appreciate the Slack integration. When we have an incident, we get an instant notification. We also use Joe Sandbox, which Singularity can integrate with, so we can verify if a threat is legitimate."
"PingSafe released a new security graph tool that helps us identify the root issue. Other tools give you a pass/fail type of profile on all misconfigurations, and those will run into the thousands. PingSafe's graphing algorithm connects various components together and tries to identify what is severe and what is not. It can correlate various vulnerabilities and datasets to test them on the back end to pinpoint the real issue."
"CoreOS Clair's best feature is detection accuracy."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."
"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."
"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."
"The UI has a lot of features."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."
"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."
"I would like PingSafe to add real-time detection of vulnerabilities and cloud misconfigurations."
"In some cases, the rules are strictly enforced but do not align with real-world use cases."
"For vulnerabilities, they are showing CVE ID. The naming convention should be better so that it indicates the container where a vulnerability is present. Currently, they are only showing CVE ID, but the same CVE ID might be present in multiple containers. We would like to have the container name so that we can easily fix the issue."
"Customized queries should be made easier to improve PingSafe."
"We are experiencing problems with Cloud Native Security reporting."
"It would be really helpful if the solution improves its agent deployment process."
"In terms of ease of use, initially, it is a bit confusing to navigate around, but once you get used to it, it becomes easier."
"One area for improvement could be the internal analysis process, specifically the guidance provided for remediation."
"An area for improvement is that CoreOS Clair doesn't provide information about the location of vulnerabilities it detects."
"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."
"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."
"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."
"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."
"The documentation needs to improve a bit."
"The image-scanning features need improvement."
"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
CoreOS Clair is ranked 26th in Container Security with 1 review while SUSE NeuVector is ranked 19th in Container Security with 7 reviews. CoreOS Clair is rated 8.0, while SUSE NeuVector is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CoreOS Clair writes "Excellent detection accuracy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SUSE NeuVector writes "Good value for money; great for policy management". CoreOS Clair is most compared with JFrog Xray, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Aqua Cloud Security Platform, whereas SUSE NeuVector is most compared with Sysdig Falco, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and Sysdig Secure.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
