We performed a comparison between Dell ECS and SAP Cloud Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MinIO, Dell Technologies, Red Hat and others in File and Object Storage."The most valuable feature for me is off-site storage."
"I have found Dell ECS to be scalable."
"Dell ECS is a cost-effective solution that provides ease of use and availability."
"Dell's technical support team is good."
"It is 100% stable. It is also scalable."
"I have been satisfied with the stability."
"What I like best about this product is that it is a complete solution, both hardware, and software, by the same vendor."
"The scalability is good."
"The features I found most valuable are the integration options."
"The entire SAP ecosystem is a valuable feature. It provides access to SAP S/4HANA, ACG systems, and their Fiori launchpad, making it easy to navigate between them. This makes the enterprise very accessible."
"The most valuable feature is the data synchronization, or the push and pull of the data."
"The most valuable features of the SAP Cloud Platform are the extensions and integrations. Additionally, there are a lot of AI-based microservices."
"The dashboard provides pretty good clarity."
"The solution can scale."
"It’s great that we have the entire suite of SAP at our fingertips."
"The solution is very useful and interactive with a dashboard for viewing other interfaces."
"Technical support needs to be improved."
"There is room for improvement in the DPI reports, as they could be made more user-friendly."
"Dell ECS could improve the price of the solution. It is expensive."
"We have concerns about the write performance. We would also like it to be easier to scale out, to add more boxes to the system. And we want improved performance, to use a next-generation NFS service."
"The solution could be more cost-effective and secure."
"From an improvement perspective, Dell ECS should aim to offer a better pricing plan to its users."
"In Taiwan, they don't have professional technical support."
"The initial setup is not so easy."
"I'd like to see more local integration."
"The product needs improvement for serverless native integrations. They should opt for serverless features as all the customers worldwide choose cloud-based products."
"When they innovate too fast, they end up confusing their customers."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Speaking about the public cloud, it's a very rigid system. So, there is not a lot of customization possible in a public cloud environment."
"The solution requires more flexibility overall."
"They are still developing this product. It does not really have 100% of the necessary features available to properly service business clients"
"I've observed a few bugs in SAP. One recent bug I found in Content Modifier is that when using a predefined header to call the current date, it prints the previous date. These are small bugs I found."
Dell ECS is ranked 5th in File and Object Storage with 25 reviews while SAP Cloud Platform is ranked 6th in PaaS Clouds with 38 reviews. Dell ECS is rated 8.0, while SAP Cloud Platform is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Dell ECS writes "Enables multiple protocol support, but its IOPS functionality needs improvement in terms of performance ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Cloud Platform writes "Provides seamless integration with CTI for streamlined data synchronization but complexity and challenges in migrating existing applications to the low-code model for custom application development". Dell ECS is most compared with Dell PowerScale (Isilon), Amazon AWS, NetApp StorageGRID, MinIO and Red Hat Ceph Storage, whereas SAP Cloud Platform is most compared with Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Mule Anypoint Platform and webMethods.io Integration.
We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.