We performed a comparison between Druva inSync and Veritas NetBackup based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two SaaS Backup solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Users do not need to contact IT administrators to recover lost or deleted files. They can do it on their own, eliminating waiting time."
"You don't need a certified administrator to manage this product."
"All the data is well encrypted. In addition, the data is split into pieces so that if an endpoint is attacked or compromised with any kind of ransomware, the compromised machine can be relocated or restored. All the data that was previously backed up can be restored from the cloud. It has a lot of security features. Druva currently offers only the cloud version on AWS. Being a cloud solution, Druva goes by a lot of security compliances and provides a security portfolio. People are very skeptical of the data security in cloud solutions, and Druva has given consideration to that. It has some good geo-location features. If a machine is lost, when the machine is switched on and connected to the internet, that machine can be geo-located and tracked. It also has got the geo-wipeout feature. If someone tries to take out the data from a lost machine, they won't be able to do that. The moment an IT admin comes to know that the machine is no longer with a user, he or she can auto-run the geo-wipeout feature so that the data cannot be read by any third party. Duality replication is a unique thing about this solution. Everybody's data is not backed up if the data is common. Similar data is not backed up from other machines. The data backup also happens very smoothly. The bandwidth choking is very less. When the data is getting backed up, the users do not even get to know. There is no impact even when the users are not using high-speed bandwidth."
"Druva is offered as a service so that we can access it from any enterprise-based browser or URL. We also have a single sign-on, which allows me to log in securely. Hence, I can easily access the system, configure it, perform day-to-day monitoring tasks, and check for any issues or configurations needed. Overall, it's a simple and easy-to-use tool with a high-speed and straightforward interface for management."
"Our customers do not need to purchase third party storage or a separate server for data backup."
"We get control over authentication policies and create an agentless backup by generating a token for that."
"It is simple to implement and use. It's very flexible."
"It has a straightforward installation."
"The deduplication feature is useful. Deduplication and compression features are what I like about NetBackup."
"Veritas NetBackup is very stable and scales out very well."
"It's a good product, it does what we want it to do."
"NetBackup is very easy for end-users."
"Specific features that I could not do without are SLPs for replication and duplication control and AIR which makes DR easy."
"Veritas NetBackup is very user-friendly and has some good quick recovery features."
"The solution is easy to scale."
"Best feature is its three-tier backup."
"The user quota is an area that needs to be improved."
"The speed could be better."
"One functionality I would like is the ability to manage multiple Office 365 tenants from a single console."
"I would like to see security improved in the next release."
"The one area that needs to improve is the pricing."
"The solution takes a lot of time during restoration."
"If I could have an accelerator or something to back up the solution on the cloud, that would be helpful. Also, it would be helpful if the accelerator could give me a buffer of a couple of days for any kind of immediate recovery on an offsite."
"The support of other cloud services needs to be improved. It has very good cloud support for AWS but not with others."
"Licensing costs are quite high."
"The solution is not easy to use. You need to train yourself step by step because it is complex, but it is a good solution. Its pricing could be cheaper."
"The pricing could be improved, and the interface could be more intuitive."
"The database integration could be better."
"GUI needs to be more user-friendly."
"There could be granular control over metadata components, specifically in the context of JSON data for the product."
"It needs support for Kernel-based Virtual Machines (KVMs)."
"The restoration method and the compression ratio need improvement."
Druva inSync is ranked 7th in SaaS Backup with 15 reviews while Veritas NetBackup is ranked 5th in Backup and Recovery with 112 reviews. Druva inSync is rated 8.2, while Veritas NetBackup is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Druva inSync writes "Lightweight, easy to install and configure, and it does its job automatically". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veritas NetBackup writes "Efficient data recovery and replication features ". Druva inSync is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365, Commvault Cloud and Acronis Cyber Protect, whereas Veritas NetBackup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Veritas NetBackup Appliance, Veritas Backup Exec and Azure Backup. See our Druva inSync vs. Veritas NetBackup report.
We monitor all SaaS Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.