We performed a comparison between Eggplant Performance and Tricentis NeoLoad based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Performance Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is not a conventional test automation tool. It uses optical character recognition (OCR) to identify objects. It makes it the best in the class."
"We don't have a big team of people that can watch the dials and check that everything is okay. We're doing a lot of the monitoring of our website and our product at the side of the desk. We need a solution that does a lot for us, and that's what Eggplant does."
"We find the solution stable and scalable."
"The solution's setup was straightforward."
"There aren't other solutions as competitive as Tricentis NeoLoad when it comes to the performance side."
"I like the scripting and parameterization features."
"Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good."
"The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good."
"Tricentis NeoLoad is quite easy to use as compared to JMeter."
"It helped in achieving the testing of on-premise applications, as well as cloud-based applications, without much difficulty."
"The stability is okay."
"Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used."
"I'd like to see the ability to integrate the user experience through device forms like AWS device forms or source labs."
"An area for improvement in Tricentis NeoLoad is its price, as it has a hefty price tag."
"The product is expensive."
"In future releases, it would be good if extra added features for integration are added into NeoLoad."
"I didn't like much of the support that you get from the Tricentis group unless it was after it integrated with Tricentis; the support is not that good."
"The UI lacks sufficient object rendering."
"We would like to see the addition of one-to-one integrations with the Tricentis Tosca suite to this product, which would then cover the end-to-end needs of our customers who are looking for a single vendor solution."
"Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing."
"Tricentis NeoLoad could improve the terminal emulation mainframe. It is not able to use the low code or no code option. You have to code it yourself."
Eggplant Performance is ranked 15th in Performance Testing Tools with 4 reviews while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 3rd in Performance Testing Tools with 62 reviews. Eggplant Performance is rated 7.8, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Eggplant Performance writes "Offers unique object identification, ideal for UI layer regression automation but limited scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes " Maintenance will be easy, pretty straightforward to learn and flexible". Eggplant Performance is most compared with Appium, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, Tricentis Tosca and OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud and Tricentis Tosca. See our Eggplant Performance vs. Tricentis NeoLoad report.
See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.