We performed a comparison between ExtremeControl and Fortinet FortiNAC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has effectively enhanced network security and integrated with other security tools to streamline operations."
"I can know which end users are using which features."
"There is information on migrating most of the cloud system's features."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The company also uses Cisco ISE in other places. I have been told that ExtremeControl is easier to use than ISE. The other reason we prefer ExtremeControl is stability. That's why they chose it for this big hospital in Oslo."
"Version 9.1 has been an improvement on previous versions. It's a good solution for SMB."
"Fortinet FortiNAC is both scalable and stable."
"I like FortiNAC's integration with other Fortinet devices. They work together well, but the solution also works with other network devices."
"The FortiNAC features I found the most valuable are security and the ability to consolidate wireless networks."
"The features are more expandable."
"The device fingerprinting feature allowed for easy creation and enforcement of access policies."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the user-friendliness, the graphical interface, and the technical support. The interface is very nice and the customization is good."
"FortiNAC has enhanced our network visibility because FortiNAC monitors MAC addresses and other network devices, like Cisco, Catalyst, or HPE switches."
"There isn't enough development for the on-premises controller."
"I'd like to have access to more information on the traffic passing through."
"The installation is easy, it can take between five minutes to four hours depending on the complexity of the environment. The speed of the installation could improve for more complex environments."
"One improvement could be better clarification, namely that the system only works optimally with all components purchased together."
"Fortinet FortiNAC's device compatibility could be improved, particularly for VoIP devices."
"The interface works fine, but it could be better."
"FortiNAC could be more scalable."
"The response and resolution time for technical support issues need to be improved."
"Its technical support needs improvement."
"They need to change or upgrade the technology in the product."
"The implementation process needs improvement. Right now, it's somewhat complicated. They could create some templates to facilitate implementation. Right now everything is done manually, and it just takes a really long time at the initial setup."
"I would like to be able to compare the configuration backup before and after."
ExtremeControl is ranked 15th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 5 reviews while Fortinet FortiNAC is ranked 3rd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 44 reviews. ExtremeControl is rated 7.2, while Fortinet FortiNAC is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ExtremeControl writes "Has a simple setup process, but it could be affordable ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiNAC writes "I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor". ExtremeControl is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Forescout Platform, whereas Fortinet FortiNAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Ruckus Cloudpath. See our ExtremeControl vs. Fortinet FortiNAC report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.