We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAnalyzer and ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Initial setup is ok."
"It gives you live logs, which can be really helpful during troubleshooting."
"Based on the logs of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer you can have it trigger actions. For example, if the log has a word or a sentence you specified it can send an alert or Syslog to an email address."
"The report templates are valuable. It works very well, and integrations also work well."
"The user interface is good and it is quite easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the capability to gather logs and generate reports."
"Storage in SSD helps in generating customized reports."
"It's a very stable product."
"The tool's reports show activities."
"It is stable."
"It's one of the easiest products. It's very simple to use."
"The initial setup is straightforward"
"I have made use of technical support and am certainly very satisfied with them."
"The user interface is very good."
"What I found most useful in ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is its integration with other ManageEngine applications. It seamlessly integrates throughout the ManageEngine suite, and that's beneficial. I also like that the solution has chain management capabilities, it has a modular approach, and it's easy to reach the support team."
"The log management has helped to improve my organization."
"They can include integration with devices, such as firewalls, endpoints, from other vendors. They can include graphic monitoring of everything in the network, not just Fortinet products. It would also be good to include customizable reports and customizable views of the reports."
"When somebody is new to the system they find it difficult to perform certain operations, like backups, and to see where the reports are."
"The UI can be more user-friendly for new users."
"The pricing could be better. They could work to make it more competitive on the market."
"It will be better if behavior or indicators of compromise were on the same licensing schema. Currently, it is an advanced feature that you have to purchase as an add-on. This is the reason we're trying to do the ELK so that we can integrate them and create those rules by using open-source software. It will also be better if it has some more integration with IT service management tools so that we can do endpoint protection and response based on those indicators of compromise or those behavior analysis rules that create events that can automatically flow. We can inject that data into a service incident ticket on our IT service management tool, and that way we can assign the ticket to the proper teams and respond right away. Currently, we only have integration with ServiceNow."
"Though FortiAnalyzer has improved over the last few versions, the user interface still has room for improvement. It's a bit dated-looking."
"The FortiAnalyzer is not scalable."
"The solution should be more price competitive."
"Support could improve to make the solution better."
"The first tier of customer service and support is not great."
"There's a lot to improve in terms of connectivity. Currently, we're utilizing it across various infrastructures and environments, including others' cloud. However, connecting it to our infrastructure and integrating it with some of our SMAX solutions poses difficulties."
"The scalability is limited."
"It may not be as easy to use as Splunk."
"The customization of reports could be a lot easier. It is not difficult but it could be made easier."
"The solution is stable. However, there are limits. For example, we can do 2,500 Syslog events per second, but if we want to do more we have to install the distributor structure, and then we can expand how many events we can do. They could improve the stability."
"The solution should improve on its log capturing capabilities."
More ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is ranked 8th in Log Management with 87 reviews while ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is ranked 21st in Log Management with 11 reviews. Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is rated 8.0, while ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer writes "We can automate event-based handling solutions, is stable, and is great for heavy traffic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer writes "The reporting features are noteworthy, as they provide templates that streamline the process of generating reports". Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Graylog, Grafana Loki and Check Point Security Management, whereas ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is most compared with ManageEngine Log360, Wazuh, SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server, IBM Security QRadar and Fortinet FortiSIEM. See our Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs. ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
