We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiSOAR and SECDO Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)."The most valuable feature is the onboarding of the workloads. You can see all that has been onboarded in your account on the dashboards."
"If you know how to do KQL (kusto query language) queries, which are how you query the log data inside Sentinel, the information is pretty rich. You can get down to a good level of detail regarding event information or notifications."
"I've worked on most of the top SIEM solutions, and Sentinel has an edge in most areas. For example, it has built-in SOAR capabilities, allowing you to run playbooks automatically. Other vendors typically offer SOAR as a separate licensed solution or module, but you get it free with Sentinel. In-depth incident integration is available out of the box."
"The initial setup is very simple and straightforward."
"The UI of Sentinel is very good and easy to use, even for beginners."
"The UI-based analytics are excellent."
"Sentinel is a Microsoft product, so they provide very robust use cases and analytic groups, which are very beneficial for the security team. I also like the ability to integrate data sources into the software for on-premise and cloud-based solutions."
"Sentinel pricing is good"
"The product can be automated for network security purposes. The solution offers a great security automation response."
"We use the product for security."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiSOAR is the playbook, which has to be defined to apply the policies."
"It is a scalable solution...The implementation phase of the product was not tough or difficult."
"The reputation of the brand is very good."
"It's great that the solution is integrated with FortiAnalyzer."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"It has a quick detection and response time."
"The ease of deployment is a valuable feature."
"It basically automates the entire alert investigation process."
"Technical support is great. Palo Alto is extremely helpful and responsive."
"I would like to be able to monitor applications outside of the Azure Cloud."
"If Sentinel had a graphical user interface, it would be easier to use. I would also like it to be more customizable."
"The playbook is a bit difficult and could be improved."
"In terms of features I would like to see in future releases, I'm interested in a few more use cases around automation. I do believe a lot of automation is available, and more is in progress, but that would be my area of interest."
"Only one thing is missing: NDR is not available out-of-the-box. The competitive cloud-native SIEM providers have the NDR component. Currently, Sentinel needs NDR to be powered from either Corelight or some other NDR provider."
"Sentinel should be improved with more connectors. At the moment, it only covers a few vendors. If I remember correctly, only 100 products are supported natively in Sentinel, although you can connect them with syslog. But Microsoft should increase the number of native connectors to get logs into Sentinel."
"We are invoiced according to the amount of data generated within each log."
"Currently, the watchlist feature is being utilized, and although there have been improvements, it is still not fully optimized."
"Fortinet's tech support overall is not great when they are at their best."
"Fortinet FortiSOAR should improve its analysis."
"The area that needs improvement is integration with multiple third-party vendors."
"The UI design of the solution needs to be changed since it can get difficult for a newbie to operate."
"Fortinet FortiSOAR should add more documentation for some use cases."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"Fortinet FortiSOAR's dashboard is not easy to understand."
"Technical support could be improved."
"The price should be reduced in order to be more competitive in the market."
"Many will try to use this as an out-of-the-box solution, however, it needs to be configured to fit what a company would like to do with it."
"Maybe the notifications setting could use a simpler setting."
Earn 20 points
Fortinet FortiSOAR is ranked 10th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 12 reviews while SECDO Platform is ranked 9th in Security Incident Response. Fortinet FortiSOAR is rated 7.4, while SECDO Platform is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSOAR writes "A stable solution that has a number of available connectors and is simple to automate". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SECDO Platform writes "Great documentation, good technical support, and very in-depth". Fortinet FortiSOAR is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane, Cisco SecureX and D3 Security, whereas SECDO Platform is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.