We performed a comparison between Google Chronicle Suite and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The platform's most valuable features are multiple connectors and data output flexibility regarding dashboards and user experience."
"The log folder is fairly simple."
"What sets Chronicle apart from other solutions is its emphasis on threat hunting rather than solely serving as a monitoring tool."
"The support team is responsive."
"Google Chronicle Suite is a highly scalable solution with good search capabilities."
"Google Chronicle Suite provides useful APIs."
"The product's most valuable feature is threat hunting. We can detect the threats directly from the console from the past data as well."
"The tool's most valuable feature is the search option, allowing easy navigation."
"Vulnerability detection is the most valuable feature. It's the tool that finds the threats."
"It's user-friendly when compared to other products."
"IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics has easy architecture, has a good portfolio and integration."
"Search capabilities are sufficient for most tasks."
"The most valuable feature is the machine learning module."
"It is the core of our entire SOX."
"We have the abilities to monitor each instance which originates on the process along with the performance of each department."
"The most valuable feature is the integration with the GRD, for banking."
"The configuration is not optimal."
"The tool is a little bit difficult to use compared to Microsoft Sentinel."
"A few areas are difficult to understand for someone who has less experience using the product."
"The tool needs to improve tasking packages. Its GUI needs to be improved. The product needs to include time-based filtration. We can only see the alert detection timeline now."
"The tool is complicated for a first-time user. It should also include newer APIs."
"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) should be more user-friendly."
"The product's default dashboard feature has a few limitations regarding availability."
"In terms of improvement, the UI can be a bit challenging for beginners."
"I would like to see some artificial intelligence and alternative solutions."
"QRadar needs a lot of fine tuning"
"For the common needs of clients to fulfill requirements, a real integration with Blueworks Live (BPA modeling tool also from IBM) and a more suitable BPM on cloud solution for midsize customers."
"The solution should include remote action capabilities."
"The only challenge with products like IBM is the EPS. You just have to be really on the events per second, as that's where the cost factor becomes a huge issue."
"The solution should enhance its capabilities of UEBA and AI/ML tech modeling."
"IBM is going through some problems with its resources currently making its support response time slow."
"There needs to be better integration with other applications."
Google Chronicle Suite is ranked 28th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 8 reviews while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 4th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 198 reviews. Google Chronicle Suite is rated 7.8, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Google Chronicle Suite writes "Swiftly navigates and analyzes extensive datasets without significant delays ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". Google Chronicle Suite is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, AWS Security Hub, Sentinel and Elastic Security, whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Rapid7 InsightIDR. See our Google Chronicle Suite vs. IBM Security QRadar report.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.