We performed a comparison between GoToMyPC and TeamViewer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Access solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I can do anything from a remote desktop as if I were sitting at my own PC."
"The solution is very quick to set up."
"The technical support is good."
"This solution has allowed us to have a highly flexible remote access solution in DR/BC situations."
"The installation is almost instant."
"It is fairly feature-rich and stable."
"The solution is a very good tool for monitoring and for remote access. Anyone is able to use it, it is simple to use."
"TeamViewer is stable."
"This solution is straightforward to use."
"TeamViewer is useful for accessing data and systems remotely. Using this application, I can access other computers using an ID number that I provide to the users whose laptop I would like to access."
"This is a unique solution that is very easy to install."
"The most valuable features of TeamViewer are the ease of connecting to remote computers. I do not need a lot of information about their computers to connect, a nontechnical person can give me the information needed for me to connect. Additionally, the solution does not gather other system information about the host or client's systems as other solutions might, such as AnyDesk."
"I have found the solution to be user-friendly even for beginners. It is not that sophisticated. There are different types of security features available, such as encryption and random machine ID."
"Integration could be improved. I'd prefer if the solution could integrate with our support and report tools as well as our timesheet reporting."
"The pricing has tripled in a small amount of time and there is not three times better service."
"If the PC is hung then it requires a reboot."
"The solution could improve by increasing or removing the time limitation on the use of a session."
"There is a paid version of this solution with more features available. However, they should provide more free features to the user, such as factor authentication."
"Support for mobile devices from Linux has been missing since the Native client was rolled out. This was a nice option, especially when trying to walk somebody who was struggling to understand something on their phone."
"We have a consultant that helps us do the virtual aspects of TeamViewer."
"The security could improve in TeamViewer."
"Considering the earlier versions of the product, I think TeamViewer used to slow down the systems."
"I would like it if the trial version of TeamViewer allowed you to have a connection for much longer."
"If were to I put myself in the seat of a small business owner, I would prefer TeamViewer to be more of a pay-once-and-own-it solution, rather than paying via a subscription model (although I am using the free version). Only annual subscriptions are available. It makes paying for it the first time seem a little daunting."
Earn 20 points
GoToMyPC is ranked 24th in Remote Access while TeamViewer is ranked 1st in Remote Access with 85 reviews. GoToMyPC is rated 9.0, while TeamViewer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of GoToMyPC writes "Accessing multiple PCs from remote locations is easy and reliable with this solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer writes "Solid cross-platform remote control, but with kludgy central management and some serious feature issues on macOS". GoToMyPC is most compared with Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, GoToAssist, VNC Connect, LogMeIn Pro and LogMeIn Rescue, whereas TeamViewer is most compared with TeamViewer Tensor, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Parallels Access, ISL Online and Skype for Business. See our GoToMyPC vs. TeamViewer report.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.