Grafana vs OpenText SiteScope comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Grafana
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText SiteScope
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
27th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the market share of Grafana is 7.8% and it increased by 43.3% compared to the previous year. The market share of OpenText SiteScope is 0.2% and it decreased by 56.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Jorge Florez - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 24, 2023
Feature-rich and has many integrations and good community support
I'm currently using Grafana. My company is a Grafana customer. I'm using the open-source version of Grafana, 9.3. Between sixty and one hundred people, mostly software engineers, use the solution in my company. Grafana requires maintenance, and that's the responsibility of the entire team. There's a plan to increase the usage of Grafana in other areas besides engineering. My company plans to create dashboards for data in other areas. I advise people who want to use the solution to try it out first. For example, Grafana has many good integrations if you need to gather metrics, and you can technically use any query to create dashboards and graphs inside Grafana. I advise that you explore the solution. My rating for Grafana is eight out of ten because it's a very good product. It's complete and has an open-source version with many features. However, some of its interface capabilities could be cheaper.
Ahmed  Sobhy - PeerSpot reviewer
May 11, 2023
Easy To Use with a very Good capabilities in monitoring the URLS and APIs
The Reports and dashboard in the solution are areas that need improvement. dashboarding has some limitations,when we're trying to create a performance dashboard on the OBM. we can't Export our reports on PDF or HTML Format , you have to access the Reports Directly from the SiteScope I think Reports and dashboards are area for improvements on the SiteScope. Also there is no Web UI for accessing and managing the SiteScope , you have to use the SiteScope Local Client . We have installed two SiteScope servers for managing 2 different sites ,it will be perfect if it has one management UI. I consider the Agentless technique is a Pros and corns in the same time as we have to open a lot of ports such like WMi , snmp and ping on all Monitored servers.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Grafana's best features are live monitoring and alerts."
"The most valuable aspect is customization. There are many customizations possible, so I like that."
"Great capacity planning and the solution has a great GUI."
"The comparison feature is very good."
"Almost any kind of visualization is possible with Grafana and all dashboards are configurable."
"This solution provides valuable insights into the health of our infrastructure in real time."
"The product's initial setup phase was very easy."
"It is easy to change and move virtual servers."
"Simple deployment: The deployment uses protocols such as NetBios, SSH, WMI, SNMP, which means that any device with any of these protocols will be monitored."
"It has multiple monitors that can be deployed OOTB, which includes basic system monitors for CPU, Disk, Memory, NIC's, etc."
"The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring."
"SiteScope has built-in flat file DB, hence it removes the dependency of an external DB for higher stability."
"Our experiences with Micro Focus SiteScope have been mostly positive as we can easily work with multiple monitors and different types of monitors pretty quickly. There are a lot of out-of-the-box solutions for us through Micro Focus SiteScope, so we don't have to do that much custom coding for the vast majority of requests that we get for monitoring. There are some limitations that we've run into and some problems every once in a while, but they've been relatively minor."
"It can monitor over a 100 technologies with built-in solution templates."
"Infrastructure monitoring is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText SiteScope is that it is easy to manage and user-friendly."
 

Cons

"Lacks event management which affects our DevOps people."
"I had issues with the solution's configuration part."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"If there was an issue on one node, we couldn't drill down and see all the issues on other nodes."
"More dashboard is required, out-of-the-box, for OpenNMS."
"It can take a considerable amount of time to learn the graphs if a long duration is selected."
"I would like the ability to download my results into any format in order to share the information with my clients."
"It would be helpful if Grafana provided more information and training on how to use Prometheus."
"SiteScope isn't productive if you want to monitor RAM or if you want to monitor some URL."
"It may lack some features other products in the category have like more detailed transaction tracking."
"The lack of an agent means that remote monitoring requires multiple firewall ports to be opened."
"It should improve its integrations with various tools, especially service management tools."
"Direct integration with an SMS gateway for sending critical alerts to the support SME. This will help customer investing in third party middleware solutions for SMS."
"More out of the box Cloud integration and capabilities."
"They should provide more templates for new vendor devices."
"Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope could improve by adding more features, such as cloud, APM, and DevOps monitoring."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Since Grafana is an open-source solution, it is free of cost."
"You need to purchase the solution's license for its commercial use."
"​Grafana is free and open source.​"
"We use the open-source version of Grafana."
"The solution is expensive."
"I am using an open-source version"
"I give the price an eight out of ten."
"For me, Grafana is a cheap tool because I don't have to spend much time learning the product since it is a simple solution."
"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."
"The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support. With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."
"SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing."
"Licensing is a little steep."
"The product's pricing should be lower since there are many open-source products that can do the same job with better user interfaces. The tool's pricing is yearly and you need to pay for support."
"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."
"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."
"It is expensive. I don't like its licensing. I don't like anything where you have to license it by individual licenses. I'm not a fan of that, but that's just me."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Retailer
6%
Financial Services Firm
30%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Grafana?
The product's initial setup phase was very easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Grafana?
For me, Grafana is a cheap tool because I don't have to spend much time learning the product since it is a simple solution. I don't know if there are different paid versions of the product.
What needs improvement with Grafana?
It was pretty complicated to integrate the product into our workflow. We relied on templates we found on the GitHub open-source repositories. It is pretty hard to integrate Grafana and set it up ac...
What do you like most about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?
The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?
I would rate the pricing of SiteScope as a five out of ten in terms of costliness. It is not overly expensive, but there is room for improvement in terms of cost-effectiveness in some areas.
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?
In terms of improvement, OpenText SiteScop could become a better solution by adding more monitoring templates, like RedScope, to make it easier to track specific technologies. It should also improv...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Microsoft, Adobe, Optum, Sky, Nvidia, Roblox, Wells Fargo, BlackRock, Informatica, Maersk, Daimler Truck, SNCF, Atlassian, DHL, SAP, JPMorgan Chase, Cisco, Citi and many others.
Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Grafana vs. OpenText SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.