We performed a comparison between Grooper and IQ Bot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The user interface is easy to use, and the flexibility is noteworthy."
"There are many options and customizations that you can make to each individual extractor that allows you to tweak it for exactly what you need."
"Lexicons where the key vocabulary can be inputted it is very helpful."
"Grooper processes difficult sorts of data and unstructured or semi-structured content very well. It's probably one of the better solutions I've seen compared to other solutions I've seen out there. It does a lot more things like segmentation extraction. It does it a lot better. Grooper has more focus on these types of freeform documents where other solutions are very generic and this is a little more elaborate in what they've done. I think they take it to the next level of extracting freeform data."
"I can train all the instances and properly adjust, inject Python code to find entities, and so on, and so forth."
"IQ Bot is quite user-friendly. And the drag-and-drop option is there, which makes the developer more comfortable."
"It offers a pretty simple setup process."
"The most valuable feature of IQ Bot is the Discovery Bots. They can detect and analyze for improvements."
"Whenever we want to create something from the previous documents or images, the OCR feature enables us to do that job easily."
"IQ Bot's best features are its variety of outputs and how it handles structured documents."
"The detection or extraction of data from the images in PDFs is the feature that I use the most. It is a good solution in terms of how easily you can administer or manage this tool. It is quite easy to use, and it is powerful in terms of what it can do."
"The ease that it provides in extracting vendor invoices, without having to configure them, was the reason for which we had gone with a solution."
"Technical support is definitely an area that they need improvement in, in terms of the front-line individuals."
"If Grooper could "sense" important fields on the document and auto-build extractors for them, that'd be really cool."
"They should have more sub-extractors or exclusion extractors so that the user does not have to make a parent data type."
"Grooper is new. It's new beta stuff, so we've had some issues, but that's understandable. Getting the beta product to more of a true release is where it needs improvement. I'm going through training now, so it's hard to judge what they have and don't have until I get through that training. Training is the main thing for me because I'm trying to learn and take things I've learned from other products and try to transfer that knowledge to this one."
"This solution could be improved by making it possible to add handwriting and signatures."
"There are certain things that OCR engines are not capable of handling currently. For example, OCR engines pick up a slash as a question mark. They also don't have the capability to handle subcolumns in a column. It would be really helpful if they can add more OCR engines with advanced capabilities to handle such scenarios. We need more cognitive abilities in the OCR engines to deal with the most complex scenarios. We also need more advanced capabilities so that IQ Bot can give better results in terms of PDF quality. This is because we cannot expect the same quality from all the vendors and customers, and there might be scenarios where we get some sort of scanned copies."
"The way this solution creates invoices can be improved. It is slow. Sometimes, it is also very complicated because you need to apply some kind of filters and effects over the images, which makes it a little bit complicated. They can reduce the complexity to manage the fields or incorporate other features. They can provide an easy way for developers to customize and program fields. The accuracy of the OCR engine can be improved. It would be great if they can also provide an ICR engine and an option to choose between OCR or ICR."
"The solution requires 32GB RAM."
"The solution's predictive model can be improved in terms of accuracy."
"Building IQ bots is time-consuming. Initially, script-wise, it would take a lot of time and also the testing of testing part of it."
"It would be helpful if the IQ Bot OCR could be integrated with third-party solutions like FlexiCapture."
"Lacks sufficient flexibility in identifying a wider variety of documents."
Earn 20 points
Grooper is ranked 21st in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) while IQ Bot is ranked 2nd in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 48 reviews. Grooper is rated 8.6, while IQ Bot is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Grooper writes "Good data ingestion and classification capabilities, supports various media types and formats, and the interface is easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IQ Bot writes "User-friendly and code reusability feature for efficient utilization of existing code repositories". Grooper is most compared with , whereas IQ Bot is most compared with ABBYY Vantage and UiPath Document Understanding. See our Grooper vs. IQ Bot report.
See our list of best Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) vendors.
We monitor all Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.