HPE StoreVirtual vs Red Hat Ceph Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
979 views|487 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Red Hat Logo
4,181 views|3,525 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE StoreVirtual and Red Hat Ceph Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed HPE StoreVirtual vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The initial setup is straightforward, not a complex procedure.""Thin provisioning lets us get the most value from the hard drives.""StoreVirtual is that it is our software-defined solution and it's everywhere.""The solution is very stable.""It's very stable and it's easy to use.""A very flexible solution.""All of the administrative tasks are easy and everything is centralized.""A company can scale it easily."

More HPE StoreVirtual Pros →

"Ceph was chosen to maintain exact performance and capacity characteristics for customer cloud.""Red Hat Ceph Storage is a reliable solution, it works well.""High reliability with commodity hardware.""The configuration of the solution and the user interface are both quite good.""We use the solution for cloud storage.""Ceph has simplified my storage integration. I no longer need two or three storage systems, as Ceph can support all my storage needs. I no longer need OpenStack Swift for REST object storage access, I no longer need NFS or GlusterFS for filesystem sharing, and most importantly, I no longer need LVM or DRBD for my virtual machines in OpenStack.""Ceph’s ability to adapt to varying types of commodity hardware affords us substantial flexibility and future-proofing.""The solution is pretty stable."

More Red Hat Ceph Storage Pros →

Cons
"In our country, Qatar, most of the industry isn't using too much HP. StoreVirtual doesn't move fast. It's not a popular product.""User interface could be improved.""The penalty for the availability is performance. So, you have to balance or choose between the availability and the performance.""The product is coming to end-of-life in the next three years.""The initial setup could be simplified to make it easier for new users.""The management aspect of the solution needs to be improved in order to make the product stronger.""The solution needs to ensure it is on par with the industry in terms of availability of features and various other options.""One of the areas that need improvement is the consolidated management platform, to manage all of the nodes from one place and the licensing around that."

More HPE StoreVirtual Cons →

"I would like to see better performance and stability when Ceph is in recovery.""I have encountered issues with stability when replication factor was not 3, which is the default and recommended value. Go below 3 and problems will arise.""It would be nice to have a notification feature whenever an important action is completed.""Please create a failback solution for OpenStack replication and maybe QoS to allow guaranteed IOPS.""We have encountered slight integration issues.""It needs a better UI for easier installation and management.""It took me a long time to get the storage drivers for the communication with Kubernetes up and running. The documentation could improve it is lacking information. I'm not sure if this is a Ceph problem or if Ceph should address this, but it was something I ran into. Additionally, there is a performance issue I am having that I am looking into, but overall I am satisfied with the performance.""Routing around slow hardware."

More Red Hat Ceph Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The prices are OK, so we don't have much difficulty selling HPE in Brazil."
  • "One of the key features about it is that when you buy either a VSA license or a StoreVirtual appliance, all your software's included."
  • "If you buy a five-year license, not only does the technical support expire after five years, but you also lose the ability to change and expand the VSA, and the systems won't go down."
  • "Licensing is not exactly straightforward, but not the worst I have ever seen."
  • "For our organization, I believe the cost is 16,000 Euros for a three-year license. It costs a bit more to do the maintenance on our servers as well. It's also on an HP ProLiant server and an organization will need to do the maintenance there also. I believe the price for that is around 2000 Euros a year."
  • "It costs less than $10,000 for one machine. If it costs more than 15% higher than this, then the customer may change to another solution."
  • More HPE StoreVirtual Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The other big advantage is that Ceph is free software. Compared to traditional SAN based storage, it is very economical."
  • "There is no cost for software."
  • "Most of time, you can get Ceph with the OpenStack solution in a subscription​​ as a bundle.​"
  • "We never used the paid support."
  • "If you can afford a product like Red Hat Ceph Storage then go for it. If you cannot, then you need to test Ceph and get your hands dirty."
  • "The price of this product isn't high."
  • "The price of Red Hat Ceph Storage is reasonable."
  • "The operational overhead is higher compared to Azure because we own the hardware."
  • More Red Hat Ceph Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:According to HPE, they say that they will stop making updates from maybe next year or something The GUI is a bit old-fashioned. It should be updated. We need the solution to offer support for newer… more »
    Top Answer:We have several customers and we have StoreVirtual on several StoreVirtual deployments.
    Top Answer:Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, easy… more »
    Top Answer:The high availability of the solution is important to us.
    Top Answer:Some documentation is very hard to find. The documentation must be quickly available.
    Ranking
    Views
    979
    Comparisons
    487
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    425
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    4,181
    Comparisons
    3,525
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    330
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HPE StoreVirtual, HPE VSA
    Ceph
    Learn More
    Overview

    HPE StoreVirtual storage ensures that organisations can optimise the benefits of server virtualisation with cost-effective high availability and disaster recovery. The iSCSI-based, scale-out storage platform is easy to manage and change – meeting ongoing business demands without creating IT bottlenecks or application downtime. Overcoming the cost and management limitations of traditional storage area networks (SANs), HPE StoreVirtual nodes use storage clustering to form a single pool of resources that enable organisations to buy only what they need today, scaling non-disruptively to meet requirements in the future.

    Red Hat Ceph Storage is an enterprise open source platform that provides unified software-defined storage on standard, economical servers and disks. With block, object, and file storage combined into one platform, Red Hat Ceph Storage efficiently and automatically manages all your data.
    Sample Customers
    NBrIX, WIND Telecom, Netrics
    Dell, DreamHost
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company12%
    Construction Company8%
    Hospitality Company8%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise55%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    HPE StoreVirtual vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE StoreVirtual vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HPE StoreVirtual is ranked 13th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 50 reviews while Red Hat Ceph Storage is ranked 3rd in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 22 reviews. HPE StoreVirtual is rated 8.2, while Red Hat Ceph Storage is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE StoreVirtual writes "Using this platform, we were able to provide virtual desktops (VDI) to our end users across WAN, to help alleviate some of the problems that we’ve had with bandwidth". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Ceph Storage writes "Provides block storage and object storage from the same storage cluster". HPE StoreVirtual is most compared with VMware vSAN, HPE SimpliVity, StarWind Virtual Tape Library, StorMagic SvSAN and DataCore SANsymphony, whereas Red Hat Ceph Storage is most compared with MinIO, VMware vSAN, Portworx Enterprise, Pure Storage FlashBlade and NetApp StorageGRID. See our HPE StoreVirtual vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage report.

    See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.

    We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.