We performed a comparison between HPE Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The WiFi and high scalability are the most valuable features."
"The reliability is good."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The main benefit of this product is the lifetime warranty, up to 99 years. For example, if your switch card fails after 10 years, and the hardware fails, it will be replaced with the very same switch or the equivalent model available at the time."
"What's most valuable in HPE Wireless WAN is that it works fine for customers with existing HPE controllers."
"The most important is that the solution is stable."
"It's easy to use."
"The most valuable features of HPE Wireless WAN are high quality and capability."
"One of its notable advantages lies in the superior performance of its antennas and radios."
"The solution is suitable for many types of environments, such as small businesses."
"The solution is easy to use and offers good management for wireless."
"I made some comparisons with other competitors and I found that Ruckus was number one in regards to stability."
"What I like best about Ruckus Wireless WAN is easy administration. After installation, you'll benefit from how easy it is to administer the product. I also like that the product can cover the whole area with just a few endpoints."
"The connectivity is good. There's no lag at all in service."
"There are numerous features, but what I like about Ruckus is that they have a good coverage range due to their BeamFlex technique."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of adding an access point."
"The scalability and the support could be better."
"Stability could be improved, and technical support needs to be faster."
"The HPE Wireless dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"Sometimes it can be difficult to find the right sizing."
"The sales sync should connect with and sync up with the customers."
"It's very old-fashioned, which is why we have made the decision to replace it."
"In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms."
"The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the prices to be lowered further."
"The connectivity and mobility for users could be improved."
"We had a problem with the delivery of the solution."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN needs to improve its pricing."
"Integration with AirMagnet, the design software, would be good because it takes the layout of a building and positions the access points accordingly, based on the areas and the construction materials."
"The solution needs to offer more analytics."
"Pricing could be improved in Ruckus Wireless WAN because obviously, everybody wants things to become cheaper. Another room for improvement in the product is from a delivery perspective, particularly the heavy delivery delays because of the chip shortage that a lot of manufacturers have to deal with. The chip shortage is not coming to an end, but Ruckus Networks has to make a plan because the ETA has slipped out from the average of three months on switches to fourteen months, which is very, very rough on the industry at the moment. Ruckus Wireless WAN could lose business to Chinese competitors, for example, HTC has a good wireless solution that I haven't tested yet, other than on POC, and it works great. I haven't yet experienced the HTC wireless solution in large deployments, so you never know how it's going to go, but HTC has managed to circumvent the chip shortage, so the ETA provided by HTC is much more preferred than the ETAs provided by Ruckus Networks, Cisco, and Aruba products."
"The support could be faster. It takes time for them to reply."
"The product needs to improve its latency and performance."
HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 7th in Wireless WAN with 18 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with , whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless and Cambium Networks Wireless WAN. See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.