We performed a comparison between IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices."
"Dashboard and the customization of the items and triggers are the most valuable features."
"The solution allows for good integration with other products."
"Zabbix can use old data to current data to set the threshold. We can use previous data to set the threshold."
"The solution allows you to configure and customize how you want to collect information from servers or other systems."
"They've already added extra features, such as noise-canceling and facial recognition, which is great."
"Like other common Linux distributions, some of the most valuable features of this solution are the ease of use and deployment. It's simple and has a lot of packages and a lot of software."
"We have found that Zabbix is more easy to use than other applications."
"Setup was straightforward. Initial deployment took two or three months."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"What I want to improve in IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is the community aspect, where IDERA would provide customers with updates on functionalities, what comes next, what IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor upgrades would be released, etc. I also want the sustainability of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to improve."
"The System Center Operations Manager can be improved."
"For us, the initial setup was complex"
"Documentation terminology could be improved."
"The reports are not great and should be improved."
"We would like to monitor other touchpoints such as ATM machines. It would be great if it can provide monitoring of ATM machines. Compatibility with other products would also be great."
"Even though it’s such a powerful monitoring system, it would be more helpful if it had a flexible UI."
"It could be more stable."
"To improve Zabbix, adding more features to support the monitoring of modern workloads like containers would be beneficial."
More IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor Pricing and Cost Advice →
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is ranked 61st in Network Monitoring Software with 5 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 101 reviews. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is rated 8.0, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor writes "It offers different licensing types that allow you to extend the services to clients; it lets you look into device performance and optimization and helps apply best practices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is most compared with , whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core and Nagios XI. See our IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.