We performed a comparison between iGrafx Process360 Live Platform and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is very stable."
"We found the technical support to be helpful."
"Provides a valuable BPMN feature."
"Simulation is most valuable."
"Another good feature is that the numbering of the shapes in iGrafx is much easier and more convenient, in comparison to what is found in Visio. So far I haven't found anything similar to what I have with iGrafx, in that regard."
"This product fulfills ninety percent of our needs, and we're happy as users of it."
"iGrafx gives you the capability of documenting your process and then the ability to use it as a tool for analysis to identify the loopholes and shortcomings of your process."
"The solution's technical support is of good quality since they offer fast and seamless services."
"Version management is helpful because I like to try different versions and then decide which of them should be the main model."
"This solution is innovative and simple to use."
"This product has helped us to work within standards for process planning."
"The most valuable feature is the glossary. It is really nice because all of the information is centralized, and that is a big help to the company."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"It's easy and fast. It's very quick to work with process teams in terms of improving processes. You just have to send them a URL and to have a process in front of them. I don't use all of the possibilities we have in Signavio. This has made it easier for people to adopt, because when we scrambled the process team together and started a process of improvement, it improved their process. They are much more involved than they had been earlier, and they can also use Signavio to make smaller improvements in the process for themselves. There are many more interactions between the process teams and Signavio than in our previous solution, where you had to hire in a professional process modeler. It's been a great improvement."
"One of the most valuable features is ease of use which has really been a good thing to put into the business. People like tools that they can just pick up and use straight-away."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the portal for spreading it over the organization, the usability, and the workflow generator in the background."
"The look and feel, along with the ease of use of the solution's web modeling version, is an area with certain shortcomings."
"It can be more user-friendly."
"I would love to see a template and shapes for customer journey mapping."
"It would be helpful to be able to do more analytics and generate reports on historical documents that have already been uploaded to the server."
"Dragging and dropping shapes is not as user-friendly as in Visio. In Visio, it's very easy to work with shapes and in very few minutes you can plot a whole, multi swim-lane, cross-functional process."
"The price could be more competitive."
"It would be nice to have a Spanish user interface available to us."
"The solution could benefit from improvements to its interface. More specifically, when compared to other tools, the process modeling features lack symbols or object types that are used to represent the information or data within the process."
"It is difficult to quickly digest the vast power of the suite and make use of those capabilities fully."
"I would like to see the inclusion of some document management functionality so that we don't need to integrate with a second solution to accommodate this."
"It is sometimes difficult to find the match between what is possible and what is wanted, or what is helpful with the product, so better documentation may assist in this regard."
"Being able to integrate the Workflow Accelerator with more products would be good."
"The tool's navigation could be improved."
"I think the interface itself can improve a bit. I think the interface is still stuck about a decade in the past, if I may be so brutal about it. Some of the buttons are really small, so you can't even see them. I think it needs upgrading to the 21st century with apps and the way we use mobile phones."
"It's very user-orientated, which is why I gave it a high rating, even if it is not perfect in every corner."
"It is not easy to learn the product."
More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is ranked 15th in Business Process Design with 15 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 6th in Business Process Design with 58 reviews. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is rated 8.4, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform writes " A reasonably stable BPM solution useful for process governance and process mining". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is most compared with Visio, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and ADONIS, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS. See our SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
