We performed a comparison between Impartner PRM and PartnerStack based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Partner Relationship Management (PRM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The valuable features are the integration with Salesforce and ease of adding assets."
"Content management is most valuable because it's the one that I use the most and the one I'm pleased about."
"The self-serve deal registration is excellent; companies can register for deals themselves, and the process is managed through our system."
"What is important to us are our partners and clients. The user experience for those partners and clients, that they're able to quickly use it, is what I like about it. It's very simple to use."
"The most valuable feature is definitely the deal registration component and the fact that it is reflected on the dashboard. It's nice that our partners have visibility into where the deals they submit stand, in terms of the sales process..."
"Since launch, our most valuable feature has been getting individual users to sign up and use our deal registration program, as well as providing a place to see all of our events globally."
"Deal registrations are huge for us because since we've been using Allbound, we are able to keep much better track of those."
"The learning tracks are extremely useful and valuable; they allow us to quickly deliver enablement training, track partners, and issue certificates to those who pass a certification exam."
"I would recommend that others interested in the solution use it because it provides a user-friendly setup process. It's easy to navigate through the setup process."
"The solution has helped us improve all across the board. Everything that we did before PRM was a one-off. We shared the content back and forth through emails. Whenever there was a scope for training or enablement, a mail would be sent on the same. The solution has helped us scale where partners could use opportunities to get trained on our services and products."
"The features that enable commission-based partner management and payment are the most valuable aspects of PartnerStack. This is undoubtedly the top priority. Additionally, their newly introduced discovery tool is impressive."
"There are three main areas that I would say were the most useful, one would not necessarily be a feature, but their UI is very easy to use."
"I would like to see more features for tracking training progress and quizzes. The progress report that Allbound generates isn't very helpful. I want to track how far a user has completed and who has or hasn't restarted. We are using a third-party platform for training purposes, especially enablement purposes. The progress reports and analytics are very powerful, and we'd like to see something along those lines. Allbound has certification, but it's missing some things from a certification point of view that are available in other products."
"Some of the integration and some of the content management could be a little bit better. They are working on some of the areas."
"The partner finder on the website is not as good as it could be."
"The user interface for admins could be a little bit better. Something that we appreciate a lot is that Allbound has increased some of the functionality that admins can do. That's good. But in terms of the user interface, there are still some improvements that can be made. Also from the user's perspective, the UI can be improved."
"They could add an LMS component to the platform where we would have courses through Allbound and a record of whether partners pass or don't pass. The quiz feature would come in more handy at that point."
"I wish Channel Insights had more intelligence where it not only provides data and stats but also offers more analysis and an extra layer of intelligence on the data that it has."
"On the design side, there could be some more updates to make it look a little bit more modern. We right now use the classic dashboard, but we're switching to the minimal dashboard that's available to try and make the UI look a little bit prettier for our partners. In the design area, there could definitely be some improvements that partners would appreciate."
"They need to improve its reporting capabilities. They don't have all the possibilities to drill down in reporting."
"I would like to see some easy ways in retrieving reports, data analytics, etc. The solution needs to be more specific from the data reporting perspective. It would make it easier to drill down by specific partners. It would be interesting to see some integrations and partnerships for the solution where they could make use of the account mapping tools."
"It would be helpful to have an improved reporting tool in the solution."
"The issue is that you can only merge one of the tracking links, and that is the primary tracking link."
"While there have been significant advancements over the years, reporting remains an area where we constantly seek improvement in terms of both accuracy and comprehensiveness."
Impartner PRM is ranked 2nd in Partner Relationship Management (PRM) with 2 reviews while PartnerStack is ranked 3rd in Partner Relationship Management (PRM) with 2 reviews. Impartner PRM is rated 8.6, while PartnerStack is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Impartner PRM writes "A stable and scalable solution for improving partner activity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PartnerStack writes "Simple to onboard and implement, with good communication and automation features". Impartner PRM is most compared with Salesforce PRM, impact.com, ZINFI PRM and Channeltivity, whereas PartnerStack is most compared with impact.com. See our Impartner PRM vs. PartnerStack report.
See our list of best Partner Relationship Management (PRM) vendors.
We monitor all Partner Relationship Management (PRM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.