Invicti vs ShiftLeft comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Invicti Logo
3,398 views|1,746 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
ShiftLeft Logo
290 views|222 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Invicti and ShiftLeft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Amr Abdelnaser
Shivendra S.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Attacking feature: Actually, attacking is not a solo feature. It contains many attack engines, Hawk, and many properties. But Netsparker's attacking mechanism is very flexible. This increases the vulnerability detection rate. Also, Netsparker made the Hawk for real-time interactive command-line-based exploit testing. It's very valuable for a vulnerability scanner.""I am impressed by the whole technology that they are using in this solution. It is really fast. When using netscan, the confirmation that it gives on the vulnerabilities is pretty cool. It is really easy to configure a scan in Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner. It is also really easy to deploy.""I am impressed with Invictus’ proof-based scanning. The solution has reduced the incidence of false positive vulnerabilities. It has helped us reduce our time and focus on vulnerabilities.""The dashboard is really cool, and the features are really good. It tells you about the software version you're using in your web application. It gives you the entire technology stack, and that really helps. Both web and desktop apps are good in terms of application scanning. It has a lot of security checks that are easily customizable as per your requirements. It also has good customer support.""The most attractive feature was the reporting review tool. The reporting review was very impressive and produced very fruitful reports.""It correctly parses DOM and JS and has really good support for URL Rewrite rules, which is important for today's websites.""When we try to manually exploit the vulnerabilities, it often takes time to realize what's going on and what needs to be done.""Its ability to crawl a web application is quite different than another similar scanner."

More Invicti Pros →

"When it comes to ShiftLeft, the most valuable feature is definitely its ease of use and cost-effectiveness."

More ShiftLeft Pros →

Cons
"The support's response time could be faster since we are in different time zones.""The higher level vulnerabilities like Cross-Site Scripting, SQL Injection, and other higher level injection attacks are difficult to highlight using Netsparker.""It would be better for listing and attacking Java-based web applications to exploit vulnerabilities.""The license could be better. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license. It's a major hindrance that we are facing while scanning applications, and we have to be sure that the URLs are the same and not different so that we do not end up consuming another license for it. Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. The licensing is tied to the URL, and it's restricted. If you have a URL that you scanned once, like a website, you cannot retry that same license. If you are scanning the same website but in a different domain or different URL, you might end up paying for a second license. It would also be better if they provided proper support for multi-factor authentications. In the next release, I would like them to include good multi-factor authentication support.""The scanner itself should be improved because it is a little bit slow.""I think that it freezes without any specific reason at times. This needs to be looked into.""The custom attack preparation screen might be improved.""Right now, they are missing the static application security part, especially web application security."

More Invicti Cons →

"Having support from senior management is crucial in making it mandatory for teams to collaborate with the security team throughout the development process."

More ShiftLeft Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is competitive in the security market."
  • "OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."
  • "We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."
  • "I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."
  • "The price should be 20% lower"
  • "Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."
  • "We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."
  • "Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."
  • More Invicti Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan.
    Top Answer:The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved.
    Top Answer:When it comes to ShiftLeft, the most valuable feature is definitely its ease of use and cost-effectiveness.
    Top Answer:When it comes to areas of improvement for ShiftLeft, I believe it could benefit from greater support from senior management. It's important to have their involvement when it comes to architectural… more »
    Top Answer:I would highly recommend ShiftLeft. It greatly simplifies the job for both security professionals and developers. By identifying and fixing bugs earlier in the development lifecycle, it significantly… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    3,398
    Comparisons
    1,746
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    340
    Rating
    8.6
    Views
    290
    Comparisons
    222
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    959
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Mavituna Netsparker
    Learn More
    Overview

    Invicti helps DevSecOps teams automate security tasks and save hundreds of hours each month by identifying web vulnerabilities that matter. Combining dynamic with interactive testing (DAST + IAST) and software composition analysis (SCA), Invicti scans every corner of an app to find what other tools miss with 99.98% accuracy, delivering on the promise of Zero Noise AppSec. Invicti helps discover all web assets — even ones that are lost, forgotten, or created by rogue departments. With an array of out-of-the-box integrations, DevSecOps teams can get ahead of their workloads to hit critical deadlines, improve processes, and communicate more effectively while reducing risk and hitting the ROI goals.

    Shipping secure code is painful and time-consuming – slowing down development teams and AppSec teams alike. ShiftLeft is on a mission to make vulnerabilities history. Our revolutionary Code Property Graph (CPG) enables us to seamlessly insert 10x faster code analysis, prioritized OSS vulnerability findings and real-time security education in one single SaaS platform integrated directly into modern development workflows. Combining our OWASP-benchmark dominating NG-SAST, Intelligent SCA, instant secrets detection, and contextual security education, ShiftLeft CORE code security platform turns every developer into an AppSec expert.

    Sample Customers
    Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company36%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm9%
    Real Estate/Law Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization51%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Computer Software Company6%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Retailer10%
    Legal Firm8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise58%
    Large Enterprise34%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Tools
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Invicti is ranked 20th in Application Security Tools with 25 reviews while ShiftLeft is ranked 26th in Application Security Tools with 1 review. Invicti is rated 8.2, while ShiftLeft is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Invicti writes "A customizable security testing solution with good tech support, but the price could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ShiftLeft writes "Effectively in identify and fix bugs early in the development lifecycle". Invicti is most compared with OWASP Zap, Acunetix, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, Qualys Web Application Scanning and HCL AppScan, whereas ShiftLeft is most compared with SonarQube, Black Duck and Semgrep Supply Chain.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.