We performed a comparison between Jitterbit Harmony and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Workload Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Easy integration with Salesforce"
"It is very easy to build integrations and processes to pull and push data."
"We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate."
"It runs like an appliance and has tremendous throughput."
"The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors)."
"Jitterbit provides the ability to quickly map data between files and databases."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"The community manager is the standout feature of the Mule Anypoint Platform, as it provides a platform to showcase your API to external parties. It is exceptionally user-friendly and enables external parties to easily utilize and consume the APIs."
"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."
"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."
"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration."
"The platform's cloud integration capabilities are good."
"Looping through complex data structures can be difficult."
"The initial setup can be a little bit difficult."
"Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs."
"I know with Salesforce updating the UI like they did, it slowed it down a lot."
"I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security."
"In the past few months, there have been some server downtimes during work hours that have affected some critical scheduled integrations."
"There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data."
"Its API management capabilities need improvement."
"I would like to see some data integration and automation."
"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having better integration with MDM. There are challenges when doing the interaction at this time."
"The platform's data integration tools need improvement on the processing side."
"The inclusion of GenAI in the tool can be good since it is an area that is currently unavailable in the solution."
"There is not much information on the internet...The transforming message is an area in the solution that needs to be improved."
"Mule should have better B2B integration."
"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."
Jitterbit Harmony is ranked 21st in Workload Automation with 13 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 8th in Workload Automation with 41 reviews. Jitterbit Harmony is rated 8.6, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Jitterbit Harmony writes "An easy-to-setup solution with good stability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Jitterbit Harmony is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Azure Data Factory, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SnapLogic and TIBCO Scribe, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform. See our Jitterbit Harmony vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors, best Cloud Data Integration vendors, and best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.