We performed a comparison between Jitterbit Vinyl and OutSystems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Low-Code Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's made things seamless and it's more efficient, and there's an audit trail where it wasn't there before."
"VINYL has given us the ability to really improve the speed with which we deploy releases and respond to the good ideas that our people have."
"Valuable features include the ability to connect to disparate data sources, the workflow engine, and the speed and agility in building apps."
"You can unite data which lives in different sources without moving that data."
"The product has reduced the time that it takes us to produce apps."
"Maintenance is very minimal. With our live production applications, they just don't break, which is great. We love that. There's zero-to-little maintenance required."
"App development, database storage, and 3rd party app integrations are great."
"It is a platform which can grow with us and get us out of spreadsheets."
"It is a stable solution, and the initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable features of OutSystems are the user interface, the flexibility to quickly integrate with almost anything in the system, and the ability to connect with databases."
"It is very stable."
"Refactoring with TrueChange is very simple."
"The most valuable feature of OutSystems is the drag and drop and toolchains in the small AI developing environment. Additionally, the documentation is helpful."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it allows users to easily build applications."
"The tool makes the development process easier."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of OutSystems is easy."
"The interface has had a lot of changes to it. It is better than it was before. However, with the subqueries in particular, this has been the most difficult part of the interface."
"The documentation isn't everything it could be, and the user forum is not always the most helpful."
"There are a lot of almost "hidden" features captured in these Edge Case settings... If you want a scroll bar at the bottom, instead of having it select rows to show, you have to select Disable Panel Location Service, which doesn't sound at all like what it's supposed to do. Naming conventions could be changed a little bit."
"Version 2.3 has a good UI but we want a more customizable UI."
"Some aspects of VINYL are limiting from a B2C standpoint. For example, it would be nice to have more flexibility with what the VINYL parameters allow us to develop within the app. It is difficult to think of an example off the top of my head, but there have been times when we couldn't develop something a particular way because VINYL didn't support it. However, the team Zudy assigned to us has been great about adjusting and finding ways around these hurdles."
"Some new features I think I'd like to see is visibility into running jobs so that we can see what the status is, or it's not stuck in its process and doing its thing, or how much longer it's going to take. I'd also like to see a native calendaring function so we can put calendars into our apps with maybe even recurring tasks or appointments and that sort of thing. We'd also like to see multi-select lists. The users being able to pick multiple things to filter on and get a list and be able to export that list."
"If it could be prettier, it might be a bit more attractive on the business side. The most meaningful improvement might be done in some of the aesthetics of the reporting and dashboarding."
"It might help if they put out different types that would provide different ways to view the data. I'd like to see more on that."
"The dashboards in OutSystems could improve. There are a lot of tabs in the service center that can be confusing."
"The documentation needs to be more robust."
"We'd like OutSystems to add stronger workflow-based automation similar to what Appian offers. It needs more workflow modeling and RPA features."
"Mobile apps need improvement."
"OutSystems does not provide any native reporting resources. All reports must be created with other tools or as a webpage."
"The installation is a bit tedious."
"The resource availability needs to be increased."
"There is room for improvement in technical support."
Jitterbit Vinyl is ranked 16th in Low-Code Development Platforms with 31 reviews while OutSystems is ranked 3rd in Low-Code Development Platforms with 46 reviews. Jitterbit Vinyl is rated 8.8, while OutSystems is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Jitterbit Vinyl writes "Can connect to any data source so we don't need to replicate data into a data warehouse to do reporting analytics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "Useful natural speech to algorithm, reliable, and beneficial automatic task". Jitterbit Vinyl is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps and QuickBase, whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and Oracle Application Express (APEX). See our Jitterbit Vinyl vs. OutSystems report.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors and best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.