Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiEDR
Sponsored
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
12th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
18th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
19th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (19th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the market share of Fortinet FortiEDR is 7.4% and it increased by 62.0% compared to the previous year. The market share of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is 1.7% and it increased by 49.6% compared to the previous year. The market share of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 3.2% and it increased by 47.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
2.2%
 

Featured Reviews

PN
May 1, 2023
The rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great
We use Fortinet firewalls for perimeter security at six to seven of our locations It provides extreme perimeter security, especially for VPN and application profiles, and seamless security monitoring through FortiAnalyzer. As a firewall the solution is great, we never had any issues. We saw time…
Christian Guillén - PeerSpot reviewer
May 8, 2023
Provides security to those operating with confidential documents since it offers a very stable environment
More than a technical issue, it's more of a commercial issue that we have faced with the solution. Some of my clients told me something about the Russia and Ukraine conflict. Because Kaspersky is from Russia, my clients mentioned that it may have some problems in the future. Speaking about the features I like to see in the solution, I would like to say that I use the solution's features as a user. I even don't know if the solution has certain features. I am uncertain whether the solution includes certain features like traffic monitoring or app usage tracking. We employ Power Automate applications on our mobile devices, which might explain the observed traffic or usage. However, I believe this knowledge is limited as I lack access to the manager console. The solution does not offer much support to its users in Spanish, so I would like to see them offer more support in Spanish.
Shreyansh Sharma - PeerSpot reviewer
May 7, 2024
Our main antivirus tool and offers adaptive threat prevention tool
The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious and time consuming task. After raising the call onto the technical support portal, usually receive a notification after 24 hours. It usually takes 3 to 4 days to conclude and resolve the issue. If 24/7 online support or a phone line where we could speak directly with technical support for real-time troubleshooting, that would be very helpful. Licensing is another aspect where trellix should look into. Different purchases are grouped together in single user account get mixed up. Categorization of purchases and their grant numbers is not available to end user.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"It notifies us if there's any suspicious file on any PC. If any execution or similar kind of thing is happening, it just alerts us. It doesn't only alert. It also blocks the execution until we allow it. We check whether the execution is legitimate or not, and then approve it or keep it blocked. This gives us a little bit of control over this mechanism. Fortinet FortiEDR is also very straightforward and easy to maintain."
"I get alerts when scripts are detected in the environment."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"This is stable and scalable."
"The stability is very good."
"We've found the solution to be stable."
"The pricing is decent."
"The detection engine running on endpoints works very well and provides a good protection level."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is a stable solution."
"It is easy to manage."
"The product is very easy to use."
"It is a scalable solution...It is a stable solution."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers centralized monitoring where we can monitor everything from a single point. I also like its security and network traffic features."
"It is very valuable in finding out unknown malware."
"It's very stable and reliable."
"I have not received any complaints about the performance."
"It's good that it periodically scans all my drives. I can stay up to date with the status of my drivers and update them if needed."
"MVISION Endpoint is so much easier and so much simpler for the lay security personnel to handle."
"The installation phase of the solution was very easy."
"The product can be installed in almost any environment"
"Provides protection against threats."
 

Cons

"ZTNA can improve latency."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"The solution is not user-friendly."
"It's not a simple implementation."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response could improve some issues and add new security files."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert needs to include a traffic interface."
"Device control is lacking in EDR."
"The product should release more frequent updates. The tool needs to improve its scalability as well."
"The solution could always be more secure."
"If a customer wants to use Kaspersky on-prem, they'll need to spend a lot on the hardware. Their server must be strong because EDR is a heavy product. You need excellent hardware to run it. It might make sense to deploy the solution in the cloud. If they add features, it will only make the product heavier and increase the hardware costs."
"The prices can go down a little bit."
"You do not have access to all the features when you use the Trellix web interface. For example, you cannot do device or drive encryption from the web interface. Also, when we're working with customers, it's sometimes challenging to get sales support. Delays mean we might lose an opportunity. Lastly, Trellix lacks some documentation about custom features."
"I would like to see more local integration for the applications that we use."
"The central monitoring dashboard needs improvement."
"We would like to solution to offer better security."
"It has very good integrations. However, its integration with Palo Alto was not good, and they seem to be working on it at the backend. It is not very resource-hungry, but it can be even better in terms of resource utilization. It could be improved in terms of efficiency, memory sizing, and disk consumption by agents."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve by an overall simplification of the solution."
"The product needs to reduce the usage of RAM and CPU."
"The reports need more development. They need more details on the reports and more details taking the executive view into consideration."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Fortinet FortiEDR is available at a very competitive price compared to the other products in the market."
"The pricing is good."
"There are no issues with the pricing."
"The hardware costs about €100,000 and about €20,000 annually for access."
"The price is comprable to other endpoint security solutions."
"I know it is tough to get big budget additions up front, but I highly recommend deploying environment wide and adding the forensic service."
"While the cost may have been high, we view it as a worthwhile investment due to Fortinet's reliability and long-term performance."
"Fortinet FortiEDR has a yearly subscription."
"Pricing for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is so-so when you compare it with its competitors. Its pricing isn't cheap nor expensive."
"The solution isn't the cheapest considering what you get. I would rate the pricing as seven out of ten."
"The price of the solution could be reduced."
"The price of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is in the middle range compared to competitors. The pricing model is based on the users using the solutions. The cost for us is approximately 2200 Algerian dinars. The price of the solution could be reduced."
"Kaspersky is licensed on a yearly basis."
"There is an annual license to use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. The price overall is a bit expensive when compared to other solutions. There are not any additional fees other than the license."
"EDR is priced on the cheaper side. Licensing for EDR is available on a yearly basis for around 80 SAR a year."
"The solution is worth its cost so I rate pricing a ten out of ten."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"MVISION is intended as an enterprise product and it is priced like one. This solution is within the price range of competitors at the enterprise level."
"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."
"It is based on an annual subscription."
"We are on an annual subscription for McAfee MVISION Endpoint. The cost for the license could be less expensive."
"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."
"Microsoft Defender is not cheap and from a cost perspective, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a better option."
"We had a discount when purchasing the solution because of the size of our company and we are happy with the price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Educational Organization
8%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Fortinet's FortiEDR and FortiClient?
I suggest Fortinet’s FortiEDR over FortiClient for several reasons. For starters, FortiEDR guarantees solid protectio...
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiEDR?
We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiEDR?
We license it per employee, so as long as the employee count remains the same, the licensing won't change. We have it...
What do you like most about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?
The integration with our hypervisor is quite smooth, especially within the Kaspersky Enterprise environment. We have ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?
We have a higher-level license, so we have access to all the features, including network inspection and antivirus pro...
What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?
I find Kaspersky can be quite resource-intensive, consuming a significant amount of RAM and CPU. Another area of impr...
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deplo...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effec...
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
 

Also Known As

enSilo, FortiEDR
Kaspersky EDR
McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Financial, Healthcare, Legal, Technology, Enterprise, Manufacturing ... 
Ferrari, Insolar, Tael, Republic of Serbia
Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.