We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"It's a state-of-the-art product for security information and event management (SIEM)."
"It has a good integration with the artificial intelligence engine of Watson."
"It has a logical, user-friendly GUI."
"The best part of this solution is having a third-party SOC."
"It showed us where weaknesses were in our environment, so we could actively target those patches first."
"The scalability is good."
"What I like about IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is that it uses machine learning algorithms to generate risk scoring for the user activity. I also like that it syncs with our Active Directory users, so it really has full coverage for all users in our environment."
"Senses, tracks, and links significant incidents and threats."
"The detection engine running on endpoints works very well and provides a good protection level."
"EDR's most valuable feature is its basic protection from malware and viruses."
"My impression of the stability of this solution is good. We have not had any issues with stability."
"The content filtering options are good."
"We compared Kaspersky and Trend Micro. The latter is significantly more expensive. That's the main difference."
"The most valuable feature of Kaspersky EDR is its simplicity. The console is easy to use and not very complex."
"Has some great features not available elsewhere."
"It is easy to manage."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pros →
"Detections could be improved."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"QRadar needs to be more specialized, along the lines of what other SIEM solutions are."
"The interface is very old. IBM should remake it into a more modern interface."
"The solution should enhance its capabilities of UEBA and AI/ML tech modeling."
"IBM is going through some problems with its resources currently making its support response time slow."
"It's resource-intensive."
"Its architecture is very complicated."
"I would like to see the update process simplified."
"The dashboards are all legacy and old."
"The system can be heavy, slowing down performance."
"Could include some additional protection."
"The solution could always be more secure."
"My opinion is that behavior detection could work better. This feature gets a high rate of false positives."
"An area for improvement in Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is its technical support because currently, technical support is delayed."
"The prices can go down a little bit."
"I would like better integration with other products."
"There's room for improvement in customer service and support. The response time when I open a ticket or communicate with the vendor could be faster."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Cons →
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 20th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 198 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is ranked 17th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 44 reviews. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert writes "Solid security and performance; overall a useful tool". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is most compared with Trend Vision One, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Cynet, Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response and Check Point Harmony Endpoint. See our IBM Security QRadar vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.