We performed a comparison between Katalon Studio and Telerik Test Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Regression Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool is easy to use. The product gives me the flexibility to use Selenium. I can also use my Java capabilities in the solution."
"The functionality of the data is very good. You can upload and disperse data using the solution."
"I like the feature where you can define a model that represents your website and then reuse the components from the model. It makes creating more test cases easy."
"This solution is very user-friendly to learn and implement, and less technical knowledge is required to handle automation."
"The most valuable feature is its automation security capabilities."
"We can write code in Java and it is easy to link to other JARs that we find on the internet, which is very handy."
"The recording feature of this product is very valuable for our testing purposes."
"Katalon Studio's biggest advantage is its price. It's a good tool for the price, albeit with some limitations when you compare it with tools like Tricentis Tosca."
"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."
"The way it identifies elements is good."
"The performance and load testing are very good."
"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."
"The price of Katalon Studio is an area of concern where improvement is required."
"The free version of the solution is not user friendly at all."
"The product’s regression testing time could be reduced."
"I can say that in my company, we struggle a lot with iOS automation."
"During parallel execution, some reports are randomly switched."
"It is difficult to identify elements on websites that use Angular or ReactJS because they don't have an option to view source code."
"It should start working on Silverlight automation."
"One improvement would be if it could support more programming languages such as JavaScript or Python. Right now, it is only on Groovy, which I think is not a too popular language."
"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."
"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."
"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."
"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."
"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."
Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Regression Testing Tools with 42 reviews while Telerik Test Studio is ranked 9th in Regression Testing Tools with 5 reviews. Katalon Studio is rated 7.8, while Telerik Test Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes "Useful multiple technology platform, scalable, but usability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Telerik Test Studio writes "Very good performance and load testing capabilities". Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Testim and Appium, whereas Telerik Test Studio is most compared with Selenium HQ, Ranorex Studio, SmartBear TestComplete, Tricentis Tosca and Visual Studio Test Professional. See our Katalon Studio vs. Telerik Test Studio report.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors, best Test Automation Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.