Kiuwan Insights vs Veracode comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Kiuwan Logo
114 views|60 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Veracode Logo
5,895 views|3,861 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kiuwan Insights and Veracode based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Static Code Analysis solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Kiuwan Insights vs. Veracode Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Can help in reducing the number of false positives.""I have found the interface to be perfect."

More Kiuwan Insights Pros →

"The centralized view of different testing types helps reduce our risk exposure. The development teams have the freedom to choose their own libraries and languages. What happens is sometimes developers feel like a particular library is okay to use, then they will start using it, developing some functionality around it. However, as per our mandate, for every new repository that gets added and scanned, a report gets published. Based on that report, we decide if we can continue. In the past, we have found, by mistake, some developers have used copyleft licenses, which are a bit risky to use. We immediately replace these with more permissive, open-source licenses, so we are safe in the end.""It has provided what we were looking for in such an application, meaning static application security testing functionality. That was what we were interested in.""The most valuable feature is the seamless automation of Veracode via the pipeline, in comparison to other solutions like Fortify SSC, which are complex to integrate through the pipeline.""It has the ability to statically scan your source code before it goes to production. It can be scanned within your testing or development environment, and that is very useful. And good explanations of all the vulnerabilities in your source code help take care of those issues in future code implementation as well.""Veracode does not require any maintenance.""The main feature, and one of the most important, is the static code analysis. We are able to complete an analysis of the security flaws with this platform. It's very good at helping us find and fix flaws.""What I found most valuable in Veracode Static Analysis is that it categorizes security vulnerabilities.""The security team can track the remediation and risk acceptance statistics."

More Veracode Pros →

Cons
"The solution is great, but improvement is needed in the number of lines of code allowed, that is the capacity. Pricing can be improved as well.""The solution has issues detecting intrusive methods."

More Kiuwan Insights Cons →

"Scanning large amounts of code can be a time-consuming process and there is scope for improvement.""The technical support service has room for improvement.""The policies you have, where you can tune the findings you get, don't allow you not to file tickets about certain findings. It will always report the findings, even if you know you're not that concerned about a library writing to a system log, for example. It will keep raising them, even though you may have a ticket about it. The integration will keep updating the ticket every time the scan runs.""It can be a bit complex because it takes a lot of time to have it complete the task.""I would ask Veracode to be a lot more engaged with the customer and set up live sessions where they force the customer to engage with Veracode's technical team. Veracode could show them a repo, how they should do things, this is what these results mean, here is a dashboard, here's the interpretation, here's where you find the results.""I would like Veracode to also have the ability to fix these flaws in a future release.""The UI is not user-friendly and can be improved.""Sometimes the scans are not done quickly, but the solutions that it provides are really good. The quality is high, but the analysis is not done extremely quickly."

More Veracode Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing can be improved as well."
  • More Kiuwan Insights Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Its complexity makes it quite expensive, but it’s all worth it, with all the engineering in the background."
  • "The pricing is pretty high."
  • "The worst part about the product is that it does not scale at all. Also, microservices apps will cost you a fortune."
  • "I think licensing needs to be changed or updated so that it works with adjustments. Pricing is expensive compared to the amount of scanning we perform."
  • "It's worth the value"
  • "Pricing seems fair for what is offered, and licensing has been no problem. All developers are able to get the access they need."
  • "It can be expensive to do this, so I would just make sure that you're getting the proper number of licenses. Do your analysis. Make sure you know exactly what it is you need, going in."
  • "The licensing and prices were upfront and clear. They stand behind everything that is said during the commercial phase and during the onboarding phase. Even the most irrelevant "that can be done" was delivered, no matter how important the request was."
  • More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use… more »
    Top Answer:The SAST and DAST modules are great.
    Top Answer:The product’s price is a bit higher compared to other solutions. However, the tool provides good vulnerability and database features. It is worth the money.
    Ranking
    12th
    Views
    114
    Comparisons
    60
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    1st
    Views
    5,895
    Comparisons
    3,861
    Reviews
    101
    Average Words per Review
    976
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Insights SCA
    Crashtest Security , Veracode Detect
    Learn More
    Overview

    Kiuwan Insights supports the continuity and integrity of open source management with a complete multi-technology solution that seamlessly integrates with key SDLC tools.

    With Kiuwan Insights, you can identify and manage:

    vulnerabilities,

    compliance, and

    operational risk

    that may arise from using open source components.

    Open source components are a significant and important part of commercial software today. Yet the use of these components introduces the risk of security vulnerabilities, as well as a need to ensure proper licensing and adherence to policies.

    Automation is an essential strategy for detection of open source components and security vulnerabilities, compliance analysis, and policy enforcement.

    Veracode is a global leader in Application Risk Management for the AI era. Powered by trillions of lines of code scans and a proprietary AI-generated remediation engine, the Veracode platform is trusted by organizations worldwide to build and maintain secure software from code creation to cloud deployment. Thousands of the world’s leading development and security teams use Veracode every second of every day to get accurate, actionable visibility of exploitable risk, achievereal-time vulnerability remediation, and reduce their security debt at scale. Veracode is a multi-award-winning company offering capabilities to secure the entire software development life cycle, including Veracode Fix, Static Analysis, Dynamic Analysis, Software Composition Analysis, Container Security, Application Security Posture Management, and Penetration Testing.

    Learn more atwww.veracode.com, on theVeracode blog, and onLinkedInandTwitter.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Manhattan Associates, Azalea Health, Sabre, QAD, Floor & Decor, Prophecy International, SchoolCNXT, Keap, Rekner, Cox Automotive, Automation Anywhere, State of Missouri and others.
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Insurance Company9%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise49%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Kiuwan Insights vs. Veracode
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Kiuwan Insights vs. Veracode and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Kiuwan Insights is ranked 12th in Static Code Analysis while Veracode is ranked 1st in Static Code Analysis with 194 reviews. Kiuwan Insights is rated 4.0, while Veracode is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Kiuwan Insights writes "Protects problematic libraries; sorely lacking in customer services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veracode writes "Helps to reduce false positives and prevent vulnerable code from entering production, but does not support incremental scanning ". Kiuwan Insights is most compared with , whereas Veracode is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx One, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Fortify Static Code Analyzer. See our Kiuwan Insights vs. Veracode report.

    See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

    We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.