We performed a comparison between LambdaTest and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel."
"LambdaTest is easy to use, and the documentation provides all the needed information."
"In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues."
"We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring."
"LambdaTest offers geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"
"The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems."
"The most valuable features are that it's essentially on-demand, and you only focus on getting the code that needs to be executed without having to worry about the OS, hardware, etc."
"It's user-friendly and offers valuable features for testing, making it a reliable tool."
"The most valuable features of Visual Studio Test Professional are the IntelliSense and the ease of adding the NuGet packages."
"Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software."
"The documentation is easy, and it helps us solve our problems."
"The most valuable feature of Visual Studio Test Professional is its ease of use."
"The solution is easy to use and they have also integrated with Microsoft."
"The tool is flexible and easy to manage. We use it since it is scalable and easy to use. It integrates with solutions."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"The setup is easy and straightforward."
"I didn't like the solution's technical support and how they communicated and tried to fix the issues of customers like me."
"Performing automation testing from UI is a little slow and could be improved."
"Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon."
"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."
"Mobile application testing would be helpful for us."
"I would like to see all of the features available in the freemium plan so that I can test them."
"The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive."
"Responsive testing UI is a bit cluttered, whereas the LT browser is much better to use."
"I would like to see more integration in the solution."
"The interface should be made attractive."
"Its UI could be better."
"The tool crashes and has high memory consumption."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"Visual Studio Test Professional should include more automation."
"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."
"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its scalability."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
LambdaTest is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 21 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. LambdaTest is rated 8.8, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Technical support should be improved, though it has great documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". LambdaTest is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio and Perfecto, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis Tosca. See our LambdaTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.